Showing posts with label CSRC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CSRC. Show all posts

Wednesday, 9 September 2015

Morning Mumble: Italics, Copper, along comes a Chinese Stimulus (iron ore?) and Anglo (In brief).

Good Morning,

It’s been about the busiest time on the markets for as long as one cares to remember, more so the demands of one’s time. 

Not only has Glencore's African copper review (ACR) made specific trades a kin to shooting fish in a barrel, but thanks in part by Freeport-McMoRan’s (NYSE: FCX) copper reduction in copper sales of 150 million pounds per year (for 2),  (Circa 68,038T's per annum). There's an avoidance to say much more on copper, at the moment.

One trader that was sweating when Glencore (GLEN) went significantly below 145, can now have a nap whilst the shorts are forced to close by Glencore's lack of confirmation (Shrewd). Are they? Do they need to? How will it be done? Glencore still eyeing options to raise $2.5bn in new equity (FT). We'll await Glencore's updates. Perhaps after they're done unwinding a few items aided conveniently by the ACR, it will give them some clarity on the balance sheet.

China have come out and acknowledged how bad it is (or how good it is about to get), with an intention to stimulate their way out of this rout, glut or downturn (Reuters). You can read this many ways, depending on how one is allowed to write the news. 

Of course, China's stimulus will be supported by the controls that are being introduced by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSR) including the soon-to-be married SHCOMP circuit breaker (CNBC). No mention of the reforms regarding to automatic trading? Or selling for that matter! There's more to this, but we're waiting on clarity on a couple of things before commentating further. With some of the tones suggesting there will be limited selling, ever...some long onlys will like this style!

The stimulus woke the iron ore price and likewise the producers appreciated the gesture, RIO/BLT/FMG and even some Jo'burg (JSE) marginal that have formed an EMC fan club. It’s a bounce and a half, perhaps with over-confidence on certain companies that are far from out of the woods. The low cost producers are viable, it's the "leveraged" higher cost crap that is rising that should raise an eyebrow or two. Perhaps, in answer to certain company directors’ prayers, they are now able to consider raising a few quid?  

As a positive, Fortescue Metals Group’s (ASX: FMG’s) white knights may now just be tempted to pay somewhere near Twiggy’s asking price. Shorts would be wise to note this potential event, with the Australian FIRB (Foreign Investment Review Board) unlikely to find any issues with an infrastructure deal. FMG have little choice but to do conduct a deal soon or risk the surplus over the longer-term weakening their hand.

Andrew ‘Twiggy’ Forrest may dislike the current offer on the table, but any deal circa $2.5B+ back on the balance sheet will give the stock more confidence. BaoSteel (EMC: June BaoSteel) are the likely front runners although, China's Hebei Iron & Steel Group and Tewoo Group (separately), will not discount any such deal.  

Keeping with the tone, Anglo American (AAL) has risen today, on the back of "selling" Rustenburg. Whether it'll be cash, shares or a mix, is immaterial to the market celebrating that AAL have removed a boil on the balance sheet. The carrying value from memory was well over £300M (please check), so there's circa £240M of Tipp-ex required on AAL’s part.

What the market should perhaps pay attention to is Sibanye. This company has in essence been "given" a liability, if one is to believe the value of the deal. Sibanye are obviously confident that they can return the operations to profitability, by the very structure of the deal. However, they won't have lost anywhere near as much as AAL! 

Have AAL sold/flogged or gifted an "asset" away when the PGM sector is starting to look like it may actually bear some modest fruit (FT: Platinum output to be hit by investment cut). 

If Sibanye can return the mine to profitability, it will be a testament to the managements understanding of mining and operations. Sibanye have a very good understanding of legacy assets, with keen eyes. It will obviously raise very sensible questions about whom should be running AAL, in the event of a turnaround. More so, what of the Scoliosis and White-Finger class action suits? Has this liability been passed on with the asset? Or are AAL fully on the hook for $1 billion.  

All for now, noted on Monitise. As a side thought, what's the unit cost for Vedanta (VED) on its iron ore operations?

Atb Fraser

Wednesday, 29 July 2015

Morning Mumble: Anto-fghastly (ANTO) & the markets alleged White Knight (NYSE: FCX) and the magical ingredients, LGO: Why I was wrong to...JKX & SLP, self-harm!

Good Morning,

Today's Q2 Production Report from Antofagasta (ANTO) gives some idea of the woes for the industry. It doesn't look great even allowing for reduction in supplies to market including the recent near 200K/t's drop in guidance from other producers, the Zambian load-shedding (EMC: Yesterday) and ANTO's own guidance revisions downwards to 665,000/t's of copper, as a result of some commissioning issues on the crusher circuit

Conveniently ANTO don't give their previous guidance, so here it is. For 2015, it was 710,000 tonnes of copper, 250,000 ounces of gold and 8,000 tonnes of molybdenum. Not only do they have the woes of gold prices being at lows, molybdenum price being at a level it's questionable whether it's a viable to process it, and cooper down 45,000/ts. (EMC: Rio molybdenum (Mo) woes). As a result ANTO's cash costs are on the increase due to the MO price and lower than expected production. One would have thought with the USD: Chilean Peso (CLP) strength, there would have been of greater benefit, but this will perhaps be reflected in Q3. 

Luckily for ANTO, there may be some hope for the copper price thanks to the markets white knight known as Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE: FCX). The market may think FCX's planned production and cost cut backs (FCX Site PDF) will assist the cooper market. But with the absence of a magical ingredients, prices are likely to stay lower and for longer, this time. FCX are unlikely, like Rio or BLT, to give up market share for the sake of the higher cost producers. 

Over to FCX, today announced it has undertaken a comprehensive review of its operating plans in its mining and oil and gas businesses to target significant additional reductions in capital spending and operating and administrative costs in response to weak market conditions for its major products. These plans will also incorporate potential adjustments to mine plans and future copper and molybdenum production volumes to reduce costs and preserve valuable resources for anticipated improved market conditions in the future. The company expects to complete this review promptly and will report its revised plans during the third quarter of 2015. 

James R. Moffett, FCX’s Chairman, Richard C. Adkerson, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and James C. Flores, Vice Chairman and FM O&G Chief Executive Officer, said, “We are responding aggressively to current market conditions affecting our primary products and to the uncertain global economic outlook. These initiatives are focused on maximizing cash flow in a weak commodity environment and on strengthening the company’s financial position. We appreciate the efforts and dedication of our global organization who are supporting our plans to implement revised operating plans. We have a positive long-term view for our markets, the inherent values in our large asset base and are positioning our company for long-term success.”

The copper and wider commodities market are lacking the magical ingredients Chinese speculation and margin. These have been absent for some time (including shadow financing) and are unlikely to return without some significant stimulus from the Chinese Government. All compounded further by a basic approach to commodity back financing that has been in contraction and limited to a basics approach. 

This brings us to the question of those with copper in inventories and/or in transit priced significantly higher either, that had a muted response to the FCX news (VED/GLEN?). Especially those needing to deleverage some $18B of commodity inventories (across the board) to maintain their credit rating and profile! Perhaps GLEN have signed up for an Experian Credit account to "manage" their credit file?


Continuing the theme from yesterday on load-shedding, it would appear Barrick Gold (NYSE:ABX) have forgotten to update the market on the load shedding issues in Zambia for their Lumwana Operations Reuters. Perhaps Vedanta, Impala and Glencore are also immune or do not feel the need. Then again, perhaps Barrick need to work out the cost impact at a C1 level as they will now be marginal. Expect cost revisions near $2.20/lb (C1) and all in near $2.80/lb (EMC estimates, no plagiarism folks). 

Question of the day, seeing as China Securities Regulatory Commission (CNBC) is investigating companies and individuals selling stocks, what can they sell to cover those margins? Cars? Houses?...Also, which Beijing bank (non-state) has the greatest exposure? The hunt is on!

Sylvania Platinum (SLP) have released 4th Quarter results. Operating in the PGM space they aren't great. They've had some cash back from Ironveld, spent some on share for "employees" of shareholders, and its unlikely any dividend will be made. The potential benefit is the selling of a few assets (or divestment) and maybe a low ball offer. As a holder, one hopes you sense my unfulfilled mind-set to this stock. As a punishment to myself, and a form of self-harm these will not be sold (self-harm). 


Finally, JKX Oil release their half yearly results. Dire, although perhaps some hope from the Interim Award International Arbitration Proceedings, it’s still not a stock for any widows. More a bet on a geopolitical and financial improvement in the sector. 

In other news today, LGO Energy drill another well. Having sold this holding and gone short, there's no rush to buy back any time soon. One would be wise to wait until the result to assess the viability of the company. Perhaps we were guilty of being too keen (EMC:) closing LGO Short too early. LGO have given no update on its financing and one has a suspicion revenues will soon be committed to interest and debt repayment. Profitable for the lender perhaps but shareholders? 

Atb Fraser

Monday, 6 July 2015

Morning Mumble: Is Greece's agenda paying off? SHCOMP etc...Copper (FQM), Iron ore, Sierra Rutile (SRX), CMCL &...Margin Margin Margin!

Good Morning,

So the vote about "terms" that were allegedly withdrawn has taken place and the outcome is now being consolidated by those denying the gravity of the situation Greece 'feels' it’s in.

Since Tsipras's election and formation of a coalition of sorts, Greece has been on a train with one track and no other routes or exits for its destiny. Not only will this have implications for Greece for the longer-term (35+ years), but will raise doubt over Europe's ability to keep its members in line (the status quo).

China is not assisting matters, with the press realising (belatedly) that the Chinese Government [was] is providing liquidity to the CFD/Spread bet companies offering margin. EMC:Margin and Securisation (03rd July 2015).

Over the weekend, the FT ran with Chinainjects liquidity in attempt to reassure markets. The CSRC (China Securities Regulatory Commission) has come out and stated what the market was aware of. The PBOC is now providing finance to the China Securities Finance Corp (CSFP) to maintain the stability of the market. Is it a case of one cannot be seen to lose on the markets, where 300+ funds have been created since February, with the majority betting long.

These actions and a blind belief of stock performance have created a squeeze of immense proportions The CSRC is tasked with attempting to stabilise something they were warning about in December 2014. 

Those fund managers "speaking positively" [99.9%] are being given the financial muscle to create stability. The PBOC, via 3 financial houses, has been in the market for huge chunks of equity, in specific entities across all sectors (34 stocks in total). One assumes giving greater liquidity in the market or slowing the fall.

The Chinese Government think "stability" is now the main staple of the day. With such a large percentage margin trading, near double the reported figure in the FT (17%). The margins/leverage on Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index (SHCOMP) and Shenzhen Stock Exchange Composite Index (SZCOMP) and SouthChina Morning Post (SCMP), is actually near 30% of the entire market if one includes the grey market. With the grey being the biggest risk to any stability, due to the leverage multiples that have been offered compared to the CSRC regulated houses.

In December 2014 the CSRC carried out "out on-site inspection" of the majority of securities firms including margin trading and short selling, pledge-based repo and securities trading with repurchase agreement. Not only did they have concerns about the rolling of positions but the amount of leverage that was being offered.

The basis of the investigation was to head off any financial boom and bust type squeezes. It did just that with commodities speculation being reduced massively, with most across the board losing any form of support. Time will tell, but it’s wise not to bet against Goliath's determined to avoid any inference of failure.

Quite where the train of IPO's and delisting of Chinese entities from Global Exchanges goes now is a question that will need answering. The Chinese market is reliant of the Emperor's new clothes to bet long. Without the onslaught of IPO's to maintain silly valuations, people will quickly start to close their positions or avoid betting on the crap.

The crap will have other companies reversed into it, to enable a perceived quick route to a Chinese listing where the regulator doesn't like sellers! See Focus Media's attempts...Reuters (June 2015). This is not the only one either! SOE (State Owned Enterprises) are going to have a rough time of it shifting of the PRC (Peoples' Republic of China's) balance sheet and into the market.

All China’s main brokerages have agreed not to sell shares, perversely so the market can recover to 4500, currently 3,775.912. There's a long if ever there was one! Additionally they have had a whip round and put near $20b into a fund to assist the “Government” with stabilisation. Please note, the Chinese Government / PBOC is likely to be spending near $100B on a similar basis and has also been active in the market! 

Moving on to ASX, FTSE and AIM, with Australia waking up on a Monday to a shock of a horror. Lo and behold commodities dropped and so did the stock. Iron Ore producers were pleasingly punished, (they ignored the Chinese warnings from EMC:warnings from Xinchuang Li  and now the price-setters are making hay whilst the sun shines. It’s not the best market with demand down and the price setters’ appetite for any premium being unplayable. One wonders if there's two steel mills margined up to the hilt speculating not only on Copper but SHCOMP & SZCOMP. 

With one major shareholder in the “China’s Shanghai Chaos fund” needing a little collateral, the fund closed its entire position on Friday/Monday.  Not necessarily the best time after the article by the FT on copper, China’slow rates sound death knell for copper carry trade by Henry Sanderson. A very good piece, which covers the woes of the industry. The read across to other commodities is also likely. 

How does this impact on First Quantum Minerals (FQM), where their production is not only in breach of the ignored covenants but also raises serious questions of the viability of the project being a "bet on the appreciation of copper." (EMC:FQM Gloat & EMC:FQM Moving the goal posts). This is just after Canaccord Genuity places a buy note out with 20% ish upside.

How all these commodity crashes and the like have propped up China's economy is another question. With factory gate prices, inflation and growth all having an impact, is it still wise to pin the tail to circa 4.5% realistic growth when stripping out wastage? 

Caledonia Mining (CMCL) give a Q22015 production update  that is in line. With the company actively managing production grades and looking to maintain the longevity of Blank Mine it’s a positive update. With the revised investment plan looking to benefit production from 2016, the company is spending its cash wisely.

Production up, although comparatively speaking production costs are creeping up again! From $959/oz. on an all in sustaining cost (AISC) bases to $969/oz. AISC eroding 1% of the 4.7% increase in production from the previous quarter. Production is still down 7.4% on the LFL comparative quarter in 2014.

What is not commented on is the grades impacting on the AISC that have spiked near 7% on the comparative quarter from $903/oz. to today's $969/oz. Overall a positive but those costs will have to be kept in check. One assumes with the sinking of no 6 Winze this has had an impact on operational costs as well?

With limited time, Sierra Rutile's (SRX) share price recovery is justified on the back of today's Q22015 production update. Having previously found little hope for rutile prices, the company appear to be managing the company pro-actively.

SRX's cash costs have been managed very well. Costs reducing from $799/t in H1 2013, $609/t in H1 2014 to today’s $527/t., mostly on the back of an increase in Rutile production and they reiterate they’re on track to meet their rutile production guidance of 120,000 - 130,000 tonnes.

All this whilst planned shut-down of the Lanti Dredge Mine for maintenance and commencement of construction of the Gangama Dry Mine being on schedule and budget! With some cherry topping, completion of the Sembehun Dry Mine scoping study. It highlights long-term dry mining project with strong economics. One will have to wait and see. Perhaps some green shoots at long last, at about the money and a recent broker appointment, its wise not to rush in.

Atb Fraser

Thursday, 29 January 2015

Morning Mumble: Chinese Property Bonds &....wonder will never cease, oil revisions downwards.

China's overseas property investment to reach $20 bln in 2015-study As Kaisa defaults, Goldman sees value in the property builders. The property slowdown is forcing the insurers and larger Chinese developers to diversify their holdings to an international hedge. Its wise to consider this the top of the property cycle as the leverage is unlikely to be paid with internal growth faltering.

Li put it simply , "there's just so much on the market a buyer is being deterred from the off ings". Li I am sure meant offerings but you get the idea. Li's been tracking the property market since the clamp down on corruption in China and the charts are staggering, dropping almost identically from 18 March 2013 to today. Surely the Chinese housing situation isn't directly linked to corruption that the dropped started 4 days after Xi Jinping became president?!

Today, Royal Dutch Shell (RDSA) announced there 4th Quarter and Full Year 2014 Unaudited Results and with it a very logical  update balancing growth and returns to address the sector issues they are experiencing was the license to print money for those short on the news. RDSA's prudence in their sales was more fortune than well-timed divestments. 

RDSA buybacks are scrapped (wisely) the investors (long only) are now the ones to take the pain, with earnings significantly under pressure and limited further divestments, I have to wonder if RDSA will be on the acquisition trail very soon, there is some very well-placed gossip of a very large acquisition. Over to UBS to get the ball rolling. Over to the Industrial Engineering components to react appropriately. 

Glencore (GLEN) appear to not know what to do with their coal operations. Glencore considers cuts at South Africa coal unit Optimum, having tried closing its Australian operations for 3 weeks, why did they bother opening it again? Now they're considering South Africa (RSA)

GLENs asset classes should be considered tier 2. Over to GLEN to meander through with an inconsistent strategy. Had GLEN had the understanding of the market like they should do, the only benefit was to the short-term price where as soon as the news of the restart came the price gave up any support. We'll blame China for the thermal coal prices, rather than the entire change in global demand. The one saviour may be that RSA could be compelled to buy / take these struggling assets off miners hands to shore up the ailing economy, with the Rand like to depreciate further there's going to be a few bargains*.

For those whom dislike the shorters, they'd be wise to check the prices of PDL (Petra Diamonds) and Gem Diamonds (GEMD), the market has awoken to the fact the sale of Antwerp Diamond Bank to a Real Estate company (Yinren Group) didn't go as planned (a year ago). 

Of great significance, Shanghai, Hong Kong shares fall as China launches new probe into margin trading China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) perhaps have found something in the alleged routine checks. 

Kaz Minerals Q4 production report from Roger Bade gets the chocolate teapot award. For myself, you'd be rude if you didn't agree there is no guidance on currency or costs. The market has to look over its shoulder at the all in net cash costs of $2.04/lb (not all in costs circa $2.75/lb EMC estimate) of the interims last August. With prices stabilising and likely to appreciate over the next 12 months, save for more economic woes and the Greek issues, plus Bozshakol Copper Project and Aktogay Copper Mine coming on stream there should be an element of knife catching now. 

Kaz's debts should not be ignored with the Chinese Development Bank (CDB) funding there's room for discussions. Kaz location to China is obviously strategic for both parties, time to start considering the positives.

Atb Fraser

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

Morning Mumble: Wafers...treading on thin ice &

Good Morning,

Hanergy Thin Film Power Group will be in the press a lot over coming months be it a squeeze or drop. The FT runs with Breakneck growth of Hanergy raises question. It’s a different twist on the repeat in the solar cycle for China. There's been significant consolidation, but do the earnings and receivables having a similar whiff about them. It’s a tightly held stock with the founder holding circa 70% of the stock, 5% out on loan, there could be a difficulty covering any short positions in a further squeeze.  

The article does not go into the trading elements on the market, Hanergy's (HNGSF) price has appreciated by a significant short squeeze. A stock which most traders have been waiting on the side lines to about turn and ride down circa 80%. 

For those not short-selling of any form HNGSF is one for the packs, its already at a pivotal point and the shorters have (please note past tense) clambered over themselves to obtain stock. This stock is worth no more than 1.30HKD on a good day and the FT will no doubt be reporting in due course about its share price movements in more detail. 

The accounts are not the only issue with HNGSF. Would HNGSF like to clarify what development grants are within the accounts including any Government payments? HNGSF's position may also be fuelled by the closure of positions that had been previously rolled over in the Chinese brokers now under review and suspended from taking new clients? Of course the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) inspections will find no issues at all...but with Shanghai and Shenzhen holding around $175B of leverages shorts it does not bode well if the industry got a regulatory slap. 

HNGSF as a listed solar companies is unusual, due to its HKEx  listing. You do not have to be too shrewd to find a way on to the train. Normally OTC stock via NYSE, or alternative derivatives but its globally available via even the most basic retail spread-betting portals. 

One illiquid delayed trade that has been been good for long until the trend now being at significant risk is the CSOP CES China A80 ETF (SEHK). Fairly simple product and one that mirrors Chinese Pref A Equities. With Chinese industrial profits falling, the market is falling back/stagnating until further stimulus is announced. 

In the land of the AIM, it’s amusing to see the markets pricing in so backward with Mosman Oil and Gas (MSMN). For those readers now aware of MSMN, (EMC: Up the creek), if you know a long holder, it might be wise to lock their drinks cabinet and submit them for drug testing. Is there any reason why this stock is above 2 pence? If you are wishing to email about MSMN please don't the sympathy departed in December 2014. 

We have another, Bagir Group (BAGR) (EMC Bagir Group May 2014 Sarcasm) today with their trading update , which comes with no surprises. Ever since the IPO the warnings have come out, the revisions downwards and the company I suspect will at best break-even. Listing at 56 pence, there's not much further for them to go. (Disc: no position now). There should be some serious questions asked about the timing of the BAGR listing and when they knew about the material downturn in trading so shortly after listing, from memory 1 month after listing a warning was out.

The disparity between Brent and WTI is not without sense, with various opinions going round about $50/bbl being the new ceiling or floor. If $50/bbl is the new floor, how is WTI trading at $45.47/bbl and Brent $49.06/bbl. 

Iron ore really starting to put the boot in on the listened smaller entities, those with higher leverage FMG (Fortescue Metals Group) and Atlas Iron (AGO: ASX). Whilst it was with some hilarity someone attempted to point out why AGO's a buy based on dividend yield. If there is one? Christmas was your exit, you've missed the boat!

JMAT (Johnson Matthey) today give the Q3 trading statement. The refinery additives and diagnostic division is going to come under further pressure being reliant on the petrochemical industry. The industry is currently sick as a dock and expenditure being scaled back, why would JMAT be exempt?

The outlook for the car and haulage industry varies but the majors guiding to a decline in production of circa 1% and as a result a drop in earnings, stagnation is likely for JMAT at best until the cycle changes. The technology premium for JMAT should be under review. Emission Control Technologies the kingpin of the company is reliant on on industries peaking or little growth. There seems to be an echo of EMC just getting it write (scuse the pun) EMC JMAT above its money and under pressure. One could argue there’s no viable benefit in holding JMAT until oil is 40% up…JMAT still missing their AAL (Anglo American) fees! 

Little time for the other items...

Atb Fraser


Thank you for the well-wishers for my daughter, she's not playing again today and didn't sleep well. Being off on business soon I hope she recovers from the lurgies.