Showing posts with label Chinese Developer Bonds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chinese Developer Bonds. Show all posts

Thursday, 29 January 2015

Morning Mumble: Chinese Property Bonds &....wonder will never cease, oil revisions downwards.

China's overseas property investment to reach $20 bln in 2015-study As Kaisa defaults, Goldman sees value in the property builders. The property slowdown is forcing the insurers and larger Chinese developers to diversify their holdings to an international hedge. Its wise to consider this the top of the property cycle as the leverage is unlikely to be paid with internal growth faltering.

Li put it simply , "there's just so much on the market a buyer is being deterred from the off ings". Li I am sure meant offerings but you get the idea. Li's been tracking the property market since the clamp down on corruption in China and the charts are staggering, dropping almost identically from 18 March 2013 to today. Surely the Chinese housing situation isn't directly linked to corruption that the dropped started 4 days after Xi Jinping became president?!

Today, Royal Dutch Shell (RDSA) announced there 4th Quarter and Full Year 2014 Unaudited Results and with it a very logical  update balancing growth and returns to address the sector issues they are experiencing was the license to print money for those short on the news. RDSA's prudence in their sales was more fortune than well-timed divestments. 

RDSA buybacks are scrapped (wisely) the investors (long only) are now the ones to take the pain, with earnings significantly under pressure and limited further divestments, I have to wonder if RDSA will be on the acquisition trail very soon, there is some very well-placed gossip of a very large acquisition. Over to UBS to get the ball rolling. Over to the Industrial Engineering components to react appropriately. 

Glencore (GLEN) appear to not know what to do with their coal operations. Glencore considers cuts at South Africa coal unit Optimum, having tried closing its Australian operations for 3 weeks, why did they bother opening it again? Now they're considering South Africa (RSA)

GLENs asset classes should be considered tier 2. Over to GLEN to meander through with an inconsistent strategy. Had GLEN had the understanding of the market like they should do, the only benefit was to the short-term price where as soon as the news of the restart came the price gave up any support. We'll blame China for the thermal coal prices, rather than the entire change in global demand. The one saviour may be that RSA could be compelled to buy / take these struggling assets off miners hands to shore up the ailing economy, with the Rand like to depreciate further there's going to be a few bargains*.

For those whom dislike the shorters, they'd be wise to check the prices of PDL (Petra Diamonds) and Gem Diamonds (GEMD), the market has awoken to the fact the sale of Antwerp Diamond Bank to a Real Estate company (Yinren Group) didn't go as planned (a year ago). 

Of great significance, Shanghai, Hong Kong shares fall as China launches new probe into margin trading China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) perhaps have found something in the alleged routine checks. 

Kaz Minerals Q4 production report from Roger Bade gets the chocolate teapot award. For myself, you'd be rude if you didn't agree there is no guidance on currency or costs. The market has to look over its shoulder at the all in net cash costs of $2.04/lb (not all in costs circa $2.75/lb EMC estimate) of the interims last August. With prices stabilising and likely to appreciate over the next 12 months, save for more economic woes and the Greek issues, plus Bozshakol Copper Project and Aktogay Copper Mine coming on stream there should be an element of knife catching now. 

Kaz's debts should not be ignored with the Chinese Development Bank (CDB) funding there's room for discussions. Kaz location to China is obviously strategic for both parties, time to start considering the positives.

Atb Fraser

Friday, 9 January 2015

Morning Mumble: Naibu (NBU), Iron Ore & Anglo Pacific & JKX + Pawnstars

Naibu (NBU) NED's request the suspension of trading in the company's shares. If this is what I think it is, it comes as no surprise. For those more versed in such matters the rocket science of Li Ning's struggles represent the issues. China's Li Ning warns of third straight yearly loss, outlook upbeat. Having closed my shorts out the other day, was I premature. I suspect so...but it would be rude if I started complaining. CamKids isn't suspended is it?

It was hoped today there would be time to share some Housing issues that are coming in the UK. Persimmon based on values and the glut First Time Buyers really needing a review based on a number of factors including First Time Buyers, however it'll have to wait as most are now in action.

Anglo Pacific Group (APF) PLC Trading Update is with no surprise, the lack of enticing assets and the returns that are dire. With jam being implied the dividend may provide some support when DRIP (Dividend Re-Investment Plan) or SCRIP is applied. Unless something materially changes in the asset base or an acquisition of a decent size is made the dividend will start to look expensive in terms of risk. Kestrel appears to be the only saviour here....and that's "anticipated" and far from in the bag. 

APF with the usual excuses about the commodities market, if one had superior assets even in dire markets the returns are assured. The inferred big deal appears to now be never coming, with limited funds, and a question over whom in this market would support the financing for a larger deal, its not for widows or orphans. Expect APF to give up some of it's more recent gains.

Iron Ore is being bounced around in my inbox with most whom disagreed with common-sense however long ago now surprisingly having a sniff of reality. This morning I was sent this through (Cheers AV) CHARTS: Iron ore price won't withstand 2015 supply flood. With their views only 10% lower than mine (currently), albeit disagree with their views on Copper and so would the market with a near 7% drop in the last month. 

With the Chinese returning to speculation (one assumes  this time with Chinese finance instead of STAN's / Citi's :-)) Copper could have some support...but for how long with  Kaisa's missing a payment . Anyone for a Government initiative for social housing? Anyone for a high risk punt on discounted property bonds? The smaller companies appear to be impacted more so...gaining short exposure is difficult though. With little takers for iron ore futures further out, prices are likely to come under further pressure. 

JKX (JKX) Oil & Gas PLC announce Elizavetovskoye Production Update which I suspect will be on deaf ears. The Ukraine has not been forgotten not the limited upside until the issues in the region are resolved. One suspects Putin's weather doll for a severe cold snap to improve his position has taken a vacation. 

H&T Group PLC (HAT) Trading Statement is a positive, with some jitters in the market it should be seen as a positively for the Pawnbroker. With Albemarle & Bond (ABM), being the short and the competition across the sector being seen as a positive, HAT are in a position to acquire and grow from strength to strength. Net Debt down, an acknowledgement of need for a retail focus has started to reward them. There's a number of ways HAT could improve their margins, however that's for them to work out. It's a long not without risks, especially with welfare reform, something to consider for all higher cost lenders, albeit HAT do have the pledge. The downside is, with limited upside on the current SP save for a buyout (or extraordinary event) its not that appealing.

Some shipping watch showing the dire state of the industry for dry goods. Around $70m is at stake for Jinhui Shipping following protracted commercial disputes with Grand China Logistics (GCL) and Parakou Shipping. With losses racking up for Jinhui...

Atb Fraser

Saturday, 22 March 2014

Chinese afterthoughts & GKP (The pundits favourite)

The reliance on state bail outs is coming to an end in China. The excuses are many fold from "utilising this time to improve quality, lower pollution, improve economics." It’s our view China has to stop investing such a large percentage of GDP into capital investments; whether that be roads, railways or redeveloping towns.

The weighting of lenders towards specific sectors is not the only issue specifically where there has been the most defaults: Solar, Coal, Real Estate and potentially Steel Mills (two are rumoured to be looking for aid). There are number of bonds due this year in China, with the market exceeding the official figures.

The Chinese bond market should be a likened to the larger platinum producers raising capital for expansion, but unsurprisingly this has to be transferred to OPEX - a prime example being Aquarius Platinum and Lonmin. What parties should be concerned with is the "amount of cash raised compared to what is available to pay these coupons." In such a short-period of time the cash has all but disappeared. 

The most recent Baoding Tianwei Electric default is a prime example. With $328 million raised 2-3 ish years ago and it barely has enough cash to make a $500K part payment that was due on the 7th March 2014.

Chinese Bonds replaced the Development Grants that the Chinese awarded to the likes of the Solar, Coal and Steel Mills for stimulus. The investors mistook these grants for a bottom line operational profit, but someone forgot to ask how much development grant has the company had and how much less will it be receiving.

If major companies are defaulting on repayments within 2 to 3 years of the issue of Bonds, it raises a significant question about how bad the balance in the economy is or is not. The latter has caused the deleveraging of positions in the Copper and Iron Ore, with consequences being felt in the product pricing such as steel with oversupply as an additional problem. 

Ironically, if one is to look at the Rusal IPO and listing in Hong Kong, the figures rather glaringly stated what was going on not only in China but Russia. The Russian state bank is alleged to be looking at bailing Rusal out. From one perspective, bailing out international lenders at this time with the Crimean issues is very unlikely. "Lenders" are likely to compromise on a deals albeit at the last minute.

The property bonds, are not only pricing risk in on Copper, but also on the entire over-cooked/leveraged sector. With Zhejiang Xingrun Properties clearly unable to pay its $500+M bond's what next?

Well my view is simple, in order to meet growth targets etc...China ironically has to let these defaults occur to avoid further over-cooking in other sectors. 

First China had Coal Defaults (albeit bailed out), then Solar defaults, then Buildings and/or Real Estate. Its only time before these positions unwind so must the leverage in Copper, Steel (the most heavily leveraged one way steam locomotive that's running out of track!), Iron ore, and Oil. This will be a short-term correction but more pronounced.

With Iron ore likely to be 61-65 a tonne 12-18 month average and that is slightly higher than our revised consensus of 55-57$. I acknowledge it’s bounced a little, but I put that down to speculators doing the same as I and buying back their short positions.

The knock on is that aim market will suffer with economies of scale not being to a magnitude to become more efficient. The prime example being the Gulf Keystone, which was it really a surprise?

Some idiots, had a belief that two Chinese chaps in the Gallery at the trial meant a buyout. Correct me if I am wrong but the best time to sell Gulf keystone was when they raised the bonds Pricingof Convertible Bonds but more importantly when one of the head honchos sold ten million

Its acknowledged that it was a transfer under a financing agreement but let’s face it, it’s still a corporate activity between two parties (aka a sell). Namely, that corporate activity involved a person whom was meant to be enhancing shareholder value but strangely was not maintaining any exposure. 

As a thought, with the Bonds under significant stress, higher cash burn, and limited production, what's the odds of it going forward? But strangely, why has the market been so slow to react and will GKP be able to raise monies at a level that is affordable for the development. It’s looking more likely that a stressed farm in deal or massively discounted Rights Issue will occur perhaps a SEDA just to cheer the holders up some more.

Genel are funded, have cash and are certainly a cheaper option in terms of director salaries than say, GKP. However, any deal would have been done long ago, and with the risks GKP have, any suitor would surely be wise to wait to see how poorly the company is before approaching.

Interesting times, but its worth consideration with a spat of corporate bonds being inked over recent months, will there be defaults? Hmmm, these 5-6% high returns in a bond are not really worth the risks of companies whom have not got the prowess nor history to back up their assertions off repayment.

GKP have not defaulted, but it will certainly have some stress and or costs attached to make payment. I would not be surprised if equity was exchanged for the repayment at a discount to market for parties to load them off to cover their own liabilities. 

It’s nice to see blogger comments working properly, I'm aware it’s been a non-goer for some time. I can read them merely not publish most of them despite trying. Even those negative ones, extolling positives about my character and shorting actions (I think everyone knows there haven't been any of those!).

Perhaps shorters should be called realisers of true value, it sounds more acceptable. This is from someone that disagreed with the shorting principles of negative betting only 4-5 short years ago. It was a realisation that people were more likely to back a dog and hold it tighter, that I realised shorting was easier to start, realise and assess companies than longing. 

There are benefits though, trading is more exciting, and shorters have a mind-set that is ironically positive, don't moan about taking a hit, but most importantly of all have to make their own decisions.

I would go as far to say it’s addictive, what better validation than making money when the majority think the price will appreciate? The underdog of the market, the contender for the most abuse.

As a final thought for those thinking about all things trading wise, I will not be sharing my data, but what percentage of AIM companies have missed their self-reported targets? Doesn't bode well for the longs out there if there's so few companies where targets are being met. 

Just a thought...

All the best, Fraser (Sat outside in the UK in March without thermals)