PM Bolt-On: Lonmin (LMI) & Anglo American (AAL) - Kumba, Exxaro, Minas...+ Copper and Chinese Interest Rate Cuts (+waffle) + WPP & Majestic Wines

Good Evening,

Last week, hopes of Lonmin (LMI) being the casualty that the Platinum/Palladium industry needed faded away, with their latest refinancing. Not only would this have removed a significant proportion of the surplus off the market but perhaps improved the outlook favourable. The deal is yet to be inked and with quite a few outcomes it’s not without its risk. 

There's gossip (or hope) of interested parties post the update on trading, business plan and funding. With a number of outcomes, the poignant question is "what equity is there in Lonmin for non-participating shareholders?" The likely outcomes:

1. LMI may raise the monies and based on their cash costs of ZAR10,339 per PGM could have a chance of recovery. Assuming one ignores the past fundraisers that Lonmin quickly burnt through - previously raising in December 2012, 
2. The $817M kept the lights on since -  LMI fail to raise the monies based on shareholders experiences to date - geo-political risk, miner/worker demands, inflationary costs (Eskom's price rises are unsustainable) and the outlook for platinum/diesel associated catalytic converter risks. 
3. LMI raise a partial amount to satisfy the banks in the interim whilst a buyer for LMI is found. The difficulty is determining the value of equity/assets after dilutive equity raise. The risks cannot be totally ignored. 

Lonmin (LMI) -

The Board intends to announce on 9 November 2015 the full terms of the Proposed Rights Issue to provide the new equity funding required of US$400 million and to publish a prospectus and the audited results for the Group for the year ended 30 September 2015. The Proposed Rights Issue is expected to be underwritten on 9 November 2015, inter-conditional with the Amended Debt Facilities.

With not long to decide, it’s over to those already torched and/or underwriting to strike a price. Could this be a 4:1 dilution?

We had Anglo American (AAL) come out the other day and say just how bad it is. Like Lonmin, Anglo face an uphill battle of immense proportions. There's a number of items to be considered, we shall be coming back to them in due course over the coming weeks, specifically the items the market is ignoring.

Not forgetting that the comparable quarter for platinum production was during a strike, it’s sensible to read right to left on the chart below. Save for the warping of platinum, the results are a disaster for shareholders. There's a real risk of De Beers being sold near the bottom of the market. Admittedly there appears to be some form of resistance from the board to dispose of the main value in Anglo, they may be forced into a corner.

The lack of debt guidance in Q3’s is always an issue, but on results there's an indication that the dividend is going to be toast. Cashflow doesn't look ‘great’ and the outlook isn't much better. We estimate $12.6B in debt currently.

Overview (from Q3)

	Q3 2015	Q3 2014	% vs. Q3 2014	YTD 2015	YTD 2014	% vs. YTD 2014
Iron ore - Kumba (Mt)	11.4	13.0	(12)%	33.9	35.8	(5)%
Iron ore - Minas-Rio (Mt)(1)	2.9	-	nm	5.9	-	nm
Export metallurgical coal (Mt)	5.5	5.1	8%	15.7	16.0	(2)%
Export thermal coal (Mt)	8.8	9.0	(2)%	26.1	25.0	5%
Copper (t)(3) (4)	171,100	176,900	(3)%	527,400	573,300	(8)%
Nickel (t)(5)	6,800	10,700	(36)%	19,800	30,500	(35)%
Platinum (produced ounces) (koz)(6)	614	541	14%	1,739	1,267	37%
Diamonds (Mct)(7)	6.0	8.2	(27)%	21.6	24.2	(11)%

 *See notes 1-7 end of commentary

We’ve previously discussed the issues at Kumba Iron (Sishen Iron Ore Company Proprietary Limited (SIOC), more so the difficulties with cost controls. This should have been implemented earlier.

Kumba’s operating costs target is a fairy tale at circa $40/t. Whether this can be sustained longer-term is another question. In the short-term there's a possibility, but sustaining capital investment can only be modestly be reduced. 

The majority of South African operators are suffering and Kumba’s Sishen FE mine is not exempt from the ensuing operational issues and potential unrest. Kumba had a reduction in iron ore production from the forecast 33Mt to 31 Mt (6%)) and an increase in waste tonnage from 200 Mt to 230 Mt (15%). 

Not only do Kumba/Anglo have lower iron ore prices, lower production and higher costs all unwelcome at the cashflow/profits level. The risks associated with the Exxaro black economic empowerment (BEE) vehicle should not be ignored. (EMC: July Morning Mumble: Anglo's further woes thanks to Kumba/Exxaro). Similar to Anglo's dividends, shareholders should not discount the possibility of any credible dividends from Kumba and consider them toast for the foreseeable future. 

Luckily for Exxaro they have the International Development Corporation (IDC) (Article: Creamer Media Mining Weekly) to bail/refinance them. The IDC do not have the greatest track record of investments, en par with the International Finance Corporation (IFC) whom notably invested in Nyota Minerals (2010). With their entire holding now being worth a paltry £48K (Approx.). Admittedly, Nyota was one of those that many (including here) got wrong at the time, but luckily wised up to.

The Kumba Iron Ore fan club need to consider how distressed the operations are. Moving more earth, for less production etc... The FX beneficiation of the South African Rand is of limited positive and remember, with FX devaluation, asset values in dollar terms will depreciate. As eluded to previously, the ArcelorMittal contract premium was in essence a subsidy / saviour for Kumba. They have now stopped gift-aiding.

Anglo's Minas Rio production was a smidge off the pace, allegedly owing to the drought. However, what Anglo have forgotten to mention the “collective holidays” that the company are utilising. Save for benefit to OPEX costs in the short-term aided in part by the Brazilian Real (BRL), ramp-up expectations should be revised downwards. Minas Rio needs 92+% operational capacity to attain a limited/exclusive status of having a profitable mine (with humour).  

We know that contractors have been delayed and/or appointments to positions not made as has been reported in the press. One expects further downgrades at Minas Rio unless their employment returns to viable capacity to improve ramp-up.

Remembering that Minas Rio is another obligation for capital expenditure on the Anglo balance sheet. Anglo are unable to cut this expenditure without significant write-downs/losses that would also impact on assumed cashflow.

Least we remind ourselves of Roy Hill’s first shipment that was pencilled in for this month that is now likely for November/December. See: GinaRinehart's Roy Hill mine to miss deadline for first shipment

Copper production was better than expect but still down, in part owing to the sale of some assets. Its noted diamond prices continue to fall and De Beers are forced to scale back production to offer some support in the market. 

The Chinese created a trading event on Friday, with the majority of commodity share prices benefiting for 10 or so minutes. That was until the realities sunk in, that as the Chinese had cut its 1 year lending rate to 4.35% (25bps reduction) it raised questions about the very state of the economy. The 6^th rate cut in 11 months.

In move contradicts the 6.9% GDP figures that came and the Press Conference of the Ministry of Commerce on October 20, 2015. Having discussed previously the need for cuts, expect a reserve requirement ratio cut of 100bps to 17.5% sooner rather than later (although this may now be averaging out, with the real time rate being lower. The interest rate cut has created more fear than confidence.

There's a likelihood of credit becoming cheaper for longer in China, the threat of further monetary easing in Europe and America’s limitations of a rate rise may give some false dawns. With the trade surplus in decline, China’s switch to consumerism/consumption will/ has to be the more rapid. 

China has to adapt to the full blown capitalist model sooner rather than later to sustain growth and sustain some form wage inflation. This will promote employment opportunities and offset the reduction in manufacturing that is occurring - evidenced in part by the reduction in trade surplus.

China’s “competitive edge" as a manufacturing super power is being eroded. The capital outflows from China are triggering a longer-term devaluation of the yuan. Over the coming quarters China will be compelled to reduce the capital/deposit requirements for property, for leases (including autos) and embrace the leveraged ratios considered the norm in the west. Examples being 90-95% mortgages (perhaps even the equivalent of help to buy in mid-lower tier cities. In addition to near nil deposit autos and cheap consumer credit.

With consumerism/consumption being promoted, China has to bet on service, retail, leisure and tourism sectors. In the absence of any consumption type stimulus China will be in a downtrend until at least demand catches up again.

Expect further cuts in the lending rates and RRR, otherwise China’s corporations are heading for default, including SEO and private/public listed companies. We know Chinese Co's are struggling to maintain debt payments.

The MarkitFlash U.S. Manufacturing PMI ™ showed a five-month high for October that is ultimately making any rate increase harder for the Fed. Admittedly the Q3 results for industrials are contradicting the FED’s confidence in the robustness of the US economy.Could the Chinese capital outflows be aiding the US Manufacturing, a Chinese version of QE with a flight to safer climbs?

More to come on WPP, a model based on acquisition? Majestic Wines - the new off-license? Eroding margins where there's a hope people will order between one and five bottles from Majestic Wine's rather than at their normal supermarket? What are the real costs of customer enticements at Naked Wines? With incentives from the likes of Moneysupermarket/Uswitch? 

Atb Fraser

• (1) Saleable production

• (2) Production includes medium carbon ferro-manganese

• (3) Within export coking and export PCI coals there are different grades of coal with                        different weighted average prices compared to benchmark

• (4) Includes both hard coking coal and PCI sales volumes

• (5)Excludes Anglo American Platinum's copper production

• (6) ASCu = acid soluble copper

• (7) TCu = total copper

PM Bolt-On; VW the unknown (bleugh), Chinese PMI Data + SOE defaults + Copper.

Good Evening,

VW rose - judging by the number of analysts pinning the name to €126-€130 a share, it would appear the world and his dog bought into it. Save for here, where undoubtedly there's trading opportunities, but the end game has yet to play out. We'll close the VW item on some teasers for those willing to burn the midnight oil:

1. What is the cost of a fix per unit, based on 85% recall uptake? We have taken this apart today and come back with various figures from the low side of $450, to the average of $1,500 per unit (remedy).
2. With the press statement and Notice of Violation outline some of the issues. Worth consideration is the Air Resource Board compliance letter. In discussions today with a very helpful lawyer, it was suggested that a mass refund process is unlikely.
3. The law affords most vehicles manufacturers the opportunity to rectify the issues. The sticking point is, not only have VW had the opportunity, but they in essence they obtained an invalid certificate of compliance (COC) by installing the defeat device. What are the implications for breaching the TREAD Act?
4.  Assuming item 2 is correct, there will be a valuation gap that will have to be honoured between the cars previous value and that of today, plus compensation.  If item 2 is incorrect, then it’s a fire sale of a significant number of models.

It’ll be prudent to revisit the VW issues as it evolves.

The Caixin Flash China General Manufacturing PMI™  - below the revised consensus. Despite being conservative on the figures with revisions, the outlook does not look great. 

Its prudent to acknowledge the impact of the WW2 celebrations and athletics, but this was allowed for in most consensus. There was even an attempt to over-shadow the woes with China’s order for 300 beoing planes and a factory.  The PMI is worth a read, and in part, validates the hard work put in to keep ahead.

We have a sense of déjà vu, with China National Erzhong Group defaulting, albeit briefly. The levels of wastage in China have been commented on here for a number of years here, making up for near 40-45% of GDP (this is declining rapidly) - contrary to those Chinese bulls. The situation is now unravelling, not only due to inflation but a liquidity event in the making.

China are going to be compelled to make a significant adjustment to their Reserve-Requirement Ratios (RRR) by a whopping 200 bps. Although this may be conducted with some form of sensibility and over a period of 6 months. Its clear that the Chinese are now starting to tamper with their figures to avoid any suggestion things the economy is stalling (Who’d have thought it!?).

Li suggests those with an interest in China, should look at the number of failed SOE (State Owned Enterprises) and their subsidiaries that have either attempted to uncouple themselves from the state or list part of their operations in Shanghai or Hong Kong. Erzhong did just this.

Erzhong is a prime example why one should avoid the alleged investment case for the majority of SOE’s. We’ve had sub-prime, interest rate rigging, auto emissions, all we need now is some form of litigation on the back of alleged SOE sales pitches implying viability. 

There’s a raft of debt issued or that was rolled over circa 2012, with repayments becoming due. Whether enticing investors into SOE’s is wise for China is another story, unless of course there’s two sets of books.

With a quick glance at the miners suggesting some were breathing a sigh of relief, there’s a number of technical indicators that Rio et al are struggling to hold on to. It would be rude to forget copper and Glencore, or as one chap called it Glenron.

With copper teetering around $5000/t (+1%), $2.29/lb it’s struggling to find support. If we believe the producers the demand and supply mix isn’t as bad as the price would suggest. In that case, with 266K/pa production cuts (assumed), why hasn’t the price sustained a recovery? That would be…

Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT) have a realisation that the rig count and mining woes aren't necessarily a good thing for earnings. Especially as JCB fired the starter pistol on the outlook.

The paired trade for midday - short Umicore (EBR: UMI) and long Johnson Matthey (JMAT) (EMC: JMAT & Umicore). To finish, some wild card (high BS rating gossip) of Intu Properties - allegedly there's some fund or other sniffing. Really? Good luck with that one. The market does love a bit of gossip. 

Atb Fraser

PM Bolt-On: Nae bad, as the Scotsman would have you believe at BHP Billiton (BLT)...and some. Come on the cheap money, lance it...!

Good Evening,

Due to the asx, one forgot to press publish.

As of last night, the themes were remarkably predictable thanks in part to the S32 interims (Short 32). BLT's expectations and the marked denial were evidenced in the webcast and the consensus. More on this in due course, as a teaser, could there be a capex issue for short32?

BHP Billiton's (BLT) webcast and presentation gave nothing more away that wasn't contained in the year end results. Despite being pressed on BLT’s expectations of commodity prices a number of times, Andrew Mackenzie elected to avoid answering. This has wider implications for those that believe it's down to the analysts to cover those assumptions (dig). Talk about horse and cart scenario, we expect to "do this" but we aren't going to tell the market the prices or assumptions we base these on. Although, notably, their assumptions by EMC estimates are "about the price" now. 

BLT are in a more privileged position than the likes of (Anto-f-ghastly) but not without risks. Not only are they on the lookout for a $6-$10B acquisition (my estimates), but their current gearing/leverage is better than most, albeit could be better (post further writedowns). BLT asserts they are determined to make projects workable/profitable at current prices, rather than the tone of "care and maintenance” other entities have suggested.

There appears to be some irregularities in the CAPEX and guidance given, a near $1.5B  difference in 6 months, which Andrew was pressed on not once but twice. Andrew wanted to take "this offline" to clarify the items. One wonders, whether these "offline discussions" will make it into the public domain, as it has some significance. From $12.5B to the quoted $11B today (for 2015) is concerning. As one analyst questioned, did they simply stop spending for 6 weeks. 

Whatever way the cat is skinned, BLT cannot maintain the dividend commitment without an improvement in cashflow via a) an increase in commodity prices, b) improvement in costs (that are entirely absent of an "all in associated costs basis,” but hey lets ignore this) c) reducing capex, including sustaining capex and finally, d) assuming the sustaining capital costs can be managed at circa $5/t they need to achieve an OPEX of $15/t. We'll be back to this in due course, because one suspects it's overly optimistic.

The elephant in the room went unanswered, namely taxation. Yes, this was ignored by pretty much everyone, taxation liability. BLT announced the woes of taxation only a week ago. If one was to break down the cost per employee, one has to wonder what the level of profitability is for Singapore worker compared to those in Australia. We are of course not suggesting the Australian Government are not considering this (‘onest gov).

Over to BLT, "almost 100 per cent of the profit from the sale of Australian commodities, from mine to customer, is subject to Australian tax – totalling $8.7 billion in taxes and royalties in Australia in the 2014 financial year." Really?...

BLT's figures were better than envisaged (EMC), but below consensus. BLT will have the same currency beneficiation that marginal producers will have to enable an improvement in OPEX costs, albeit with asset writedowns.

Regular readers will note the views here of the FX AUD trades, as the favoured currency play. Although it’s sensible to consider the implications of Saudi Riyal and the U$D peg. Those complacent marginal traders surely don't want another CHF debacle? Do they? 

There couldn't be more noise made about the "simplification premium" if they had tried. However, when pushed on it, one couldn't help but wonder if Andrew/BLT really meant was the ‘board’ has an inability to multitask (& perhaps some analysts). When pushed on it, to expand on the meaning of simplification, it didn't have the same dramatic effect that the term hoped to embrace. In essence, the board got rid of a short (Short32/South32: EMC call), to enable a focus on "three pillars." (EMC term now).

Without wanting to do a pseudo-analysis of the results, it comes down to earnings. These are guaranteed to fall for the next financial year, save for some act of god (Chinese mega-stimulus). BLT’s sensitivity to sustain operating profitability (P+ve cashflow); namely iron ore, oil and copper, doesn't bode well. 

There are challenges to the guidance given today, in light of the current outlook for “the three pillars” (as one cannot mention the other). Quite how the market expects BLT to perform, isn't so much a mystery, but more so reliance on a recovery of the three of the pillars. We’ll ignore the bauxite/Aluminium issues presented by Dupre Analytics, but the significance should at least acknowledged. Hat-tip on some significant work there and one suspect there’s “more to come on other Chinese entities.”

Oil's decline is likely to impact around $1.65B on BLT revenues. The recent decline in steel, metallurgical coal prices and iron ore, will undoubtedly impact. Whether BLT's guidance to their iron ore costs can be achieved is another story.

Rio Tinto's (RIO) is the preferred model, with RIO leading the charge in cash cost terms. Simply, one would be sensible to factor in a cash unit cost of $16.5/t for BLT, rather than the hoped for $15/t. 

The same for the read across on copper, where Rio advised that the second half is expected to be impacted by a decline in grades and water availability (Ref: to Escondida). Although absent from the BLT today and lacking further discussion. Should we stop looking for themes in accounts and just accept what we are told? 

Longer-term, today presents an opportunity assuming there's a telescope looking past the 3.5/7 year cycles and considering the super cycle per se. It was/is an opportunity for sentiment, aided in part by the Chinese Central Bank / PBOC meddling with the liquidity.

The move was an admittance of how bad things have got, with more to come. All expected, whilst avoiding shock and ore, an RRR decline of a further 100-150bp (EMC Estimates) is required. We note the auto-leasing implications, saving the likes of Daimler/VW.

Contrary to some expectations, the EMC has a target price/range of 1350 for BLT based on today's news. If they there are currency movements in the AUD (Aussie Dollar/expected) and the Chilean Peso (CLP/also expected) and USD interest rates, then BLT are set to benefit on an operating cost level basis. For the short-termism, it was rude not to have some "on the news."

If one wants a dividend at the expense of growth (CAPEX) this is the stock. Assuming BLT avoid biting the bullet and acquire an asset in the oil and gas sector, there's limited upside (circa 35%). 

More on ANTO in due course now their cash has gone. Thoughts for the evening - what are the implications for Caterpillar in the current climate. What are the implications for the Chinese “losing their life savings?” This has more weight that most analysts give credit for….analogies to a stalling plane going virtual were made on the morning call. 

Finally, thanks in part to Li, China (the people) want an explanation for their losses. With prices high, wages low, and China aiming for 7%, we have to acknowledge GDP (we’ll call it faux-growth) is now lower. This is evidenced in part by “cheap money” being thrown at the boil, rather than lance it. Come on the cheap money...whoops, not good for Wall Street…

Atb Fraser

Morning Mumble: First Quantum Minerals (FQM) (some positives), CAM, yet more flipping of options! The spat at Mwana Africa (MWA)

Good Morning,

First Quantum Minerals (FQM) gave an update on the ramp-up progress of its new copper smelter in Zambia after the bell yesterday. Significant progress has been made on the cash costs with a modest improvement in C1 costs from $1.36 to $1.25/lb. It’s wise to ignore the previous quarter's $1.77/lb on the basis of ramp up.

A positive for the management, commercial production is expected to be declared in the third quarter of 2015 - ahead of the previous expectation of the first quarter 2016. Although one could argue this was a soft target. Not forgetting that C1 costs are likely to be impacted by the Zambian corporate tax and mining royalty regime, that starts around the time of commercial production, if not before.

With the stock trading at near 900 pence, there's going to have to be some consistent production records including cost efficiencies to warrant such a valuation with copper circa $2.60/lb ($5700/t). Amazingly where the Chinese are closing out yet again!

Staying on the theme of copper it's noted at the price and with the likely expenditure, one savvy analyst a k a Roger Bade has downgraded Central Asia Metals (CAML) to a hold, based on the price of copper, the CAPEX and distraction from Kounrad. 

As one should expect from EMC, it’s always wise to consider Directors true alignment with shareholders. Today we are informed that Nigel Robinson, Chief Financial Officer excised and flogged all his options. Not the first time this has occurred either. If one assumes Robinson is a savvy man with financial prudence, then one would be wise to ask why he has sold all his options. 

This is not the first time Robinson has conducted such an activity and brings in to question the purpose of the options in the first place. Long-term incentives plans and options are allegedly to align management with shareholders. If this was the case, considering today's announcement and that previously, sell, Nicholson and Clarke's excise and sell (22 October 2014), Robert Cathery's sale (1st October 2015), Nigel Hurst-Brown sale (23 April 2015). 

As always, directors’ alignment or lack of raising significant questions. Being at the helm, especially in Nigel Robinson's case, gives a damn good indication of the outlook. Hargreaves Hale will have something to discuss this weekend? Another ENK Plc (ENK) in the making? Over to D&A...and Montoya Investments if memory serves me correctly. With the potential for greater dividends over the coming year, it raises questions about the sales but also M&A. 

It never rains but pours for the serial disappointer Mwana Africa (MWA). It the gossip is correct MWA have had a spat with their NOMAD and Broker and the result is notice being given. Surely it's nothing to do with Mr Yat Hoi Ning?!?! With an operations and exploration update due next month, if you're a holder keep fingers crossed for calmer seas, perhaps even some positive news out of Bindura? 

Today's woes are being felt for the holders in Molycorp (NYSE: MCP) as the company files for chapter 11. Not unexpected. As a leveraged bet on the Chinese restrictions that unwound the company and sank its fortunes, there may be some hope post any restructuring. With a proverbial piste of a share price, any holders left really need to consider their thesis on investing. Mark Smith, must be relieved to not be involved with MCP anymore, and Largo Resources (TSX: LGO) looking brighter. 

TSX: LGO have gained final approval from the Brazilian Development Bank "BNDES" and its consortium of commercial banks for the restructuring of its main construction debt facility (the "BNDES Facility"). In addition, TSX: LGO (EMC: Largo needs $60M CDN Minimum) raised $75.3M CDN to shore up their balance sheet. With the price around the placing circa CDN$0.80, there's some potential, but not without associated sector risks. 

Anglo Pacific (APF) should welcome the income from the Maracás Menchen Mine Royalty, having fallen on the back of the coal settlement contacts (EMC: APF Coal Settlement Contracts Ref: APF), they're going to struggle to hit their target this year. 

Red Rock Resources (RRR) are now hunting elephants, with an investment in an oil company of the same name. This mini-me-conglomerate really needs to consider shareholder returns before conducting such plate spinning exercises. Today means the final proceeds from the Columbian sale have been committed / spent. This companies performance and confetti issues are not going unnoticed, but what next? If one remembers the Ariston advert of yesteryear, it’s highly probable. 

Finally, the thought goes to Richard Magides acquiring a stake in Energy Resources of Australia (ASX: ERA) via Zentree Investments. Perhaps the white knight caveat of a Chinese or Singapore backers is coming in to play? Notification of Holding may be a leverage play on the consecutive losses running at near AU$1 Billion. 

Atb Fraser

PM Bolt On: Chinese Property the shadow of valuations, and a scatty walk through Chinese economics.

Good Evening, 

The EMC and various traders/parties have been batting a few (add-on) ideas around for a while and coming to firmer conclusions today. A summary with suggestions about the distortion and inaccuracies in the  property data in China. Today's discussions drew similarities between Spain and China in separate discussions.

The consensus being that the measure for house prices is warped, stalling more than the Chinese official data implied. With what can only be described as greater downside risk than 2009 (comparative point). Revenues in the form of company turnover and taxation have all fallen, save for some clever accounting, it’s a sector in decline. 

Any Chinese analysis always has a caveat of government intervention (the stimulus), including the possibility of social housing schemes (large scale) being introduced by the Chinese Government or 101%+ mortgages. The sales incentives on the property sales should be discounted out of the price achieved and disclosed to Government data and revenue collectors. The incentives only serve to distort the figures that should have a greater impact than the ones announced.

Margins have been squeezed, with developers failing to incentivize buyers, whether for speculation or their own home. The Government has increased the liquidity, reduced the down payment criteria and loosened the first home-buyer entitlements to include those that had previously owned. 

With the Chinese Government slowly running out of options to stimulate the economy at a local government level, expect to hear more about western investment in Chinese public-private partnerships (PPP), reducing the burden in the short-term on local governments.

So with banks having a biased interest in prices being maintained and how the value is carried on the books against their reserve requirement ratios (RRR). We're bordering on a Spanish manipulation of the housing market by the banks, with an arm’s length consent by the Chinese Government. Any drop of more than 6% year on year leaves the Chinese banks being forced to make drastic cuts to their balance sheets. Alternatively, the Government reducing the RRR requirements further to allow for greater flexibility.

There's a glut of property inventory out there, both commercial and residential, those Irish property speculators will be all too familiar with and wary of. Although China is far from at the extreme of the Irish property contagion, it does have resounding similarities such as excessive supply, unrealistic balance sheet valuations, overly expectant prices and the minor problem of evaporating demand. 

The lower income, like most economies, are the drivers in China and the transfer of wealth between state and comrades is slowing and potentially contracting. PPP could just be China’s saviour to avoid a property contagion and at least meet more realistic growth targets in the short-term whilst international expectations are reset.

Whilst remembering the caveat "without further stimulus", Li and I, have been working on some modelling for the Chinese property sector. (worse for commercial property). We'll exclude the likes of the equivalent Chelsea areas within Shanghai（上海), Shenzhen, Guangdong Province（广东深圳）, Beijing（北京）and Sanya, Hainan Province（海南三亚） (EMC has gone international with copy and paste; we hope Li's versions are not offensive!). 

The EMC is off the fence and a depression and/or staling in property prices until 2017 and perhaps beyond. This of course depends on how the economics of China pan out and how the Chinese Government motivate the economy re: PPP. With factory gate prices, earnings and raw materials all under pressure, this could extend beyond 2017 and as far as 2020 before a realistic growth story sets in. There's a risk of a property contraction year on year for near 3 years, with restricted growth their after. 

The contraction in financing is being noticed by the traders, save for the larger houses whom have internal liquidity and government cheques. A limited example being the Chinese purchases of gold, down circa 30%, copper, iron ore and coal. The property woes are being exacerbated by the contraction in financial liquidity (within China and externally) for speculation.

It implies the RRR of most of the major Chinese banks is questionable with balance sheet valuations ignoring the obvious elements of the economy…or are they, as speculators disappear?? It’s not going unnoticed that Chinese companies are refocusing on international property portfolios (the hedge) like Japan in yesteryear.

In part, the commodities have depreciated as the Chinese were incapable of tapping yet more finance for leveraged speculation (after significant loses), this has a knock on effect throughout China. It would be wise to consider the Chinese milk crash, which is unfolding as we sip our coffee, the pork crash that didn't appreciate during Chinese New Year (historically appreciating). Those Pork Riblets, Semi-Meaty have a greater margin if exported to the Congo now, we'll ignore the political issues some miners should be disclosing.

When considering how weighted the Chinese economy is reliant on the property sector, its concerning no action has been taken. The lack of taxation revenues both centrally and locally is having an impact. Various measures are likely but property taxation will have to be utilised to plug a gaping hole in the local government budgets bolting on to PPP. This will further kick property developers as those speculators derisk their "investments" as the asset becomes a greater liability. As such, China, although further from negative interest rates than most, could be more reliant than any central bank on these measures.

We acknowledge that China's property taxation model is dependent on building, with low cost ownership currently the norm. The property taxation and revenue model will have to be rebalanced, with an equilibrium applied to existing home taxation plus a new homes sales tax. The Local Government debt has grown disproportionately to the decline in property taxation revenues, and the lack of growth, contradicting the desire to “urbanise.”

The rolling up of local government debt will have to be answered sooner rather than later. It would be wise to reset the expectations of Chinese growth to 4.5% now to iron out these problems, rather than anything near the 7% the analysts think sensible. 

There's implications for demand on all base metals and resources excluding oil and gas, and water. More time is required to explain the latter three with China as a consumer and space required to validate the statement. Sweeping statement perhaps, but not without good reason. 

Atb Fraser.