Morning Mumble: PLUS Sponsorship. Ageism stifling China and AMC (Amur Minerals) raising? + First Ore @Wolf Minerals + ESKOM 24.78% price increase (Yes 24.78%)

Good Morning,

PLUS's RNS was lacking a number of details, namely a trading update. If the gossip from some alleged recently departed employee is correct, trading has been significantly lower than expected. As always, there is a bias with ex-employees, so it’s wise to factor that in a significant degree of BS. Playtech (PTEC) have ignored the Material Adverse Effects (MAE) and simply bought the stock. So today' there's the sponsorship of Atlético Madrid. One assumes in agreement with PTEC?

Brand recognition in Spain? Give over! It’s wise to a) consider the deal done b) limited upside so why speculate positively c) Look at PTEC's earnings. Something a few funds may be conducting at the moment. PTEC should be towards the top of a funds lists of stocks to consider. The same as Slater and Gordon (ASX: SGH), whom must be near the most shorted stock on ASX! 

With a near 100% increase in shorting activity on the ASX, a weakening currency and issues with commodities. Australia may be entering choppy seas, positively this is good as its the main FX trade. Having performed very well for near two years solid long, but with intra-months/weeks/days shorts. In the absence of a material change those speculators will be looking to GBP1: AUD$2.5. 

The shorter’s preference appears to be consumer staples, industrials/transport and energy sectors, although mining and finance are not exempt. There's been disproportionate increased in retail, industrials and energy stocks for obvious reasons. The mirror trade appears to be in China as well, with a similar pattern emerging, especially in light of the growth/appreciation on the Chinese markets. 

It’s no wonder with the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index (SHCOMP) rising at silly speeds, it has to consolidate at some point. The trend has been commodities, housing, internet of things and then equities (long). It certainly looks like the trend is on negative betting/derivatives on the SCHOMP is now upon it. Where some suggest a more realistic level of 3,500 on the SCHOMP is sustainable, with sensible appreciation, rather than over inflated stocks. 

Although one is wise not to bet against the Chinese Government. Expect to see "services" being listed as the shift from manufacturing, moves to services and support type companies. Certainly in light of the PPP's (Public Private Partnerships). The issues aren't unknown, where a "Weak Corporate Governance" has necessitated change for a number of reasons. Not only to shift "some debt" off a municipals balance sheet but also to improve productivity and create a more logical flow of wealth from corporate parent to civilians. 

China, with its archaic laws and policies relating to promotion and opportunity are stifling creativity. Its beyond sensibility that China still operate a level of promotion that is age related, where if "passed-over", workers may as well spend 20 years getting ready for retirement. In essence if you miss an age related status-attainment scheduled promotion, the opportunity thereafter is very limited. Save for the comrade that gets caught with his hand in the till, its likely there will be no further promotion.

It’s no coincidence that Hu Jintao was considered young at (near 50) when he came to notoriety being elected to the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC) and later taking charge of the Secretariat of the Communist Party of China. At near 50, it raised a few eyebrows. 

China needs to evolve, it will do, certainly with the preferred way forward being PPP's but likewise, expect the herd to follow suit as the roll out gathers speed. Poor Governance and the increase in peaks and troughs within sectors is dire for growth, as short-termism sets in. Not only in construction quality but financial management, where myopia and bonuses will win the day.

Having sold everything in Amur Minerals (AMC) and gone short, its starting to make one wonder who is ascribing a valuation of £120M to AMC. The asset needs a lot of work and does not appear economic at the prices today. 

One has a suspicion that AMC are out with their cap, based on an unrealistic current valuation, with a logistical nightmare upon them as well. Even if they can raise that "not-so-insignificant" amount of cash to develop the project (Kun-Manie PFS). With a commitment to "pre-production evaluation" to the Government by 1 December 2020. Its got more downside risk than anything...you've been warned! 

We have first ore for Wolf Minerals (WLFE). The hard work is paying off, although the share appreciation that was expected is yet to occur. Perhaps in part due to tin and tungsten prices, but also a tightly held stock with limited possibilities, save for production and returns. Dull? Not likely...

Finally, the ESKOM announcements will be unwelcome to most this morning. Worthy of a read SA unites against Eskom tariff hike bid and bringing forward the need for cash for some miners already in the crapper!

Atb Fraser

PM Bolt On: Chinese Property the shadow of valuations, and a scatty walk through Chinese economics.

Good Evening, 

The EMC and various traders/parties have been batting a few (add-on) ideas around for a while and coming to firmer conclusions today. A summary with suggestions about the distortion and inaccuracies in the  property data in China. Today's discussions drew similarities between Spain and China in separate discussions.

The consensus being that the measure for house prices is warped, stalling more than the Chinese official data implied. With what can only be described as greater downside risk than 2009 (comparative point). Revenues in the form of company turnover and taxation have all fallen, save for some clever accounting, it’s a sector in decline. 

Any Chinese analysis always has a caveat of government intervention (the stimulus), including the possibility of social housing schemes (large scale) being introduced by the Chinese Government or 101%+ mortgages. The sales incentives on the property sales should be discounted out of the price achieved and disclosed to Government data and revenue collectors. The incentives only serve to distort the figures that should have a greater impact than the ones announced.

Margins have been squeezed, with developers failing to incentivize buyers, whether for speculation or their own home. The Government has increased the liquidity, reduced the down payment criteria and loosened the first home-buyer entitlements to include those that had previously owned. 

With the Chinese Government slowly running out of options to stimulate the economy at a local government level, expect to hear more about western investment in Chinese public-private partnerships (PPP), reducing the burden in the short-term on local governments.

So with banks having a biased interest in prices being maintained and how the value is carried on the books against their reserve requirement ratios (RRR). We're bordering on a Spanish manipulation of the housing market by the banks, with an arm’s length consent by the Chinese Government. Any drop of more than 6% year on year leaves the Chinese banks being forced to make drastic cuts to their balance sheets. Alternatively, the Government reducing the RRR requirements further to allow for greater flexibility.

There's a glut of property inventory out there, both commercial and residential, those Irish property speculators will be all too familiar with and wary of. Although China is far from at the extreme of the Irish property contagion, it does have resounding similarities such as excessive supply, unrealistic balance sheet valuations, overly expectant prices and the minor problem of evaporating demand. 

The lower income, like most economies, are the drivers in China and the transfer of wealth between state and comrades is slowing and potentially contracting. PPP could just be China’s saviour to avoid a property contagion and at least meet more realistic growth targets in the short-term whilst international expectations are reset.

Whilst remembering the caveat "without further stimulus", Li and I, have been working on some modelling for the Chinese property sector. (worse for commercial property). We'll exclude the likes of the equivalent Chelsea areas within Shanghai（上海), Shenzhen, Guangdong Province（广东深圳）, Beijing（北京）and Sanya, Hainan Province（海南三亚） (EMC has gone international with copy and paste; we hope Li's versions are not offensive!). 

The EMC is off the fence and a depression and/or staling in property prices until 2017 and perhaps beyond. This of course depends on how the economics of China pan out and how the Chinese Government motivate the economy re: PPP. With factory gate prices, earnings and raw materials all under pressure, this could extend beyond 2017 and as far as 2020 before a realistic growth story sets in. There's a risk of a property contraction year on year for near 3 years, with restricted growth their after. 

The contraction in financing is being noticed by the traders, save for the larger houses whom have internal liquidity and government cheques. A limited example being the Chinese purchases of gold, down circa 30%, copper, iron ore and coal. The property woes are being exacerbated by the contraction in financial liquidity (within China and externally) for speculation.

It implies the RRR of most of the major Chinese banks is questionable with balance sheet valuations ignoring the obvious elements of the economy…or are they, as speculators disappear?? It’s not going unnoticed that Chinese companies are refocusing on international property portfolios (the hedge) like Japan in yesteryear.

In part, the commodities have depreciated as the Chinese were incapable of tapping yet more finance for leveraged speculation (after significant loses), this has a knock on effect throughout China. It would be wise to consider the Chinese milk crash, which is unfolding as we sip our coffee, the pork crash that didn't appreciate during Chinese New Year (historically appreciating). Those Pork Riblets, Semi-Meaty have a greater margin if exported to the Congo now, we'll ignore the political issues some miners should be disclosing.

When considering how weighted the Chinese economy is reliant on the property sector, its concerning no action has been taken. The lack of taxation revenues both centrally and locally is having an impact. Various measures are likely but property taxation will have to be utilised to plug a gaping hole in the local government budgets bolting on to PPP. This will further kick property developers as those speculators derisk their "investments" as the asset becomes a greater liability. As such, China, although further from negative interest rates than most, could be more reliant than any central bank on these measures.

We acknowledge that China's property taxation model is dependent on building, with low cost ownership currently the norm. The property taxation and revenue model will have to be rebalanced, with an equilibrium applied to existing home taxation plus a new homes sales tax. The Local Government debt has grown disproportionately to the decline in property taxation revenues, and the lack of growth, contradicting the desire to “urbanise.”

The rolling up of local government debt will have to be answered sooner rather than later. It would be wise to reset the expectations of Chinese growth to 4.5% now to iron out these problems, rather than anything near the 7% the analysts think sensible. 

There's implications for demand on all base metals and resources excluding oil and gas, and water. More time is required to explain the latter three with China as a consumer and space required to validate the statement. Sweeping statement perhaps, but not without good reason. 

Atb Fraser.