Good
Morning,
Significant learning curves over
lunch yesterday, many thanks DC (now armed with a reading list)!
Time this morning has been spent
working through trading costs and taxation! Over the next week or so things are
changing, with a more balance level of CFDs and spread bets (not fully
decided). Having spent time looking at the difference between DMA CFD and spread
bet, there's no obvious conclusion. They both have their benefits.
Using CFD for a small 22 ish trades
a month its got its pros including arbitrage between two separate providers
based on differing prices (E.g. IB/IG/City Index). Hugo has kindly been working
on the difference in returns between CFD and Spreadbet. Having initially
thought there was a loss of profits/greater losses as a result of the spread
compared to the benefits of CFD DMA, it's actually contrary including return on
capital invested!
The returns from spread bet were
near 8% higher than CFD for longer term positions, and 11% lower when trading
on tighter/small (immediate) margins or moves on a stock/market. Some CFD
positions would have cost more even allowing for 5-6bps on the spread. Limiting
speculation / investing for decent gains rather than tighter/marginal
fluctuations is the benefit of spread betting. In essence, whatever your
trading platform, get on the blower and demand a better deal, or move
(sometimes the latter is even better than the pros of staying)! Alternatively,
if you have never made money at it, give up. It needs to be explored
in-depth.
For the likes of the Leggie there's
limited alternative but those with a short-term view rather than hell-freezing
over, it might just be wise to consider other options. Then again, if you're a
fund manager, perhaps there's just a need to get the position right? Well that
would be a start for most, especially on AIM or in commodities.
The bigger dipper of iron ore is
now smacking of a sense of desperation (Cheers AG & a sensible analyst TB).
We are not saving whales, but our
iron ore (Aussie perspective). With blame being thrown towards those
appearing to be winning the war on production costs. Of course this has nothing
to do with Andrew 'Twiggy' Forrest's belief that Australia's AAA rating is
under threat, nor the reliance on revenues from commodity exports/mining.
If the Australian nation haven't
noticed the lopsided nature of their economy. There's the formation of a
property bubble, stimulus (via interest rate cuts) and the raft of tax measures
to stimulate the economy. It all might not be enough for Australia (as
represented by depreciation of the Aussie Dollar). With the AUD range bound
circa GBP1: AUD1.90-2.00 there's the possibility for a break out above £1:AU$2,
pending Chinese risks of QE (see below).
With near a full month since an
adjustment in the tick size on the DCE (Dalian Commodity Exchange) for iron
ore, coal and coking coal. The main beneficiaries appear to be the
hedgies rather than the intended liquidity increase. Sector
confidence has been misguided as a result of all commodities bouncing since
recent lows (albeit for the wrong/right reasons (pending your view).
With the markets acknowledging that
China has 'yet again' fired the gun via the China Iron & Steel
Association (CISA) comments about over capacity (Bloomberg:
Iron ore over capacity) and steel production tailing off! Ironically the
having an echo of March 2014's warnings (EMC: Chinese
Iron Ore & the Glut of over capacity...price sunk to $114 (circa).
Supply is limited for immediate
delivery (justifying the modest premium) its certainly supported the price in
Rio, BLT and Vale's favour + the higher cost producers ticking over with lower
fuel costs and 'just surviving.' With peak demand for steel over, the market is
grasping a reality, where speculation has warped the realities (in the
short-term). See: Monthly
crude steel production in the 65 countries included in the report, in thousands
of tonnes & World
Steel
With March figures of steel
production down, the commodity price rises are looking unjustified and any bull
would be well justified to consider the risks. With capital outflows, reduced
mortgage and second home deposit requirements, lower steel production,
deflationary pressure on factory gate prices, do China have any choice but
outright QE? China are likely to have to considering outright bond purchases
(or similar (remember its an amateur here).With China LG (Local Government)
debt simply untenable and swelling as loans are recognised on paper via bond
issuance, there is a need to deal with the issues especially light of their
main revenues not recovering as expected. .
Limited time to cover the abysmal
Vedanta preliminary
results. Some analysts might need to revisit "accountancy" for
dummies, with impairments of a modest $6,744.2 billion. Somewhat different to
the full
year results 2015 all those days ago (15). Its wise to have a look at
debt and equity levels, after the write-downs, net debt on the up and credit
downgrades. VED might just need a knight in shining armour! (Chinese
development bank?). Costs are dire and increased...the market reaction is
pathetic!
No time for the Sirius
Minerals (SXX) planning officers tactics in what appears to avoid
their duty/responsibility...Anglo Pacific (APF) interim management statement is 'half' decent but
needs some more work. Amara Mining might be wise to consider the term robust in
their PFS for Yaoure, the market reaction, AMA simply need to
prove up the indicated resources and rework their models. The current returns
on today's news/model are not as enticing, sensible, but not outstanding (need
to listen to the conference
call when its available, having missed it this morning. Gold supply contracted a fraction, investment purchases increased and risk aversion after US Data gave it a decent jump for some small profits.
Atb Fraser
Fraser- Nice call re "hell freezes over positions"- hehehe- it upgrades me from a stale bull portfolio and is on the way to my own favourite for my forever portfolio- "until the asteroid hits portfolio". It did make my coffee spill, which always causes chaos here.
ReplyDeleteRe SXX- as the Planning Officers immediate reaction re any National Park development is a default No- bugger off you twats, an open recommendation is probably the best SXX could have hoped for. It passes the buck so Mr France can keep his dignity and his job too and the committee each have their vote. Those who have more time than me have looked at each vote and think its in the bag as a Yes--- lets hope they weren't advising Ed Balls re his Morley count a week ago :-)) I hope Mr Balls has received your sympathy card now.....
Re CHL- 10p looked a bit low for that raising, but they had come up from 11p on 4/5/15 so that's one excuse for them. £850k should keep the wheels on the road for another year, so past the summers check re dodgy documents and on the road to the final hearing. The mkt was down 2.5p before todays champagne afternoon tea (its a hard life) on v low turnover and is now recovered so Mr Mkt has let them off with the cheap, shares for the pals raise terms.
Cheers. The Leggie