Good Morning,
The analysts and reporters are of the opinion stockpiles at ports are 'yet
again' too low and there's a sudden need for restocking. One would be wise to
consider how China have managed their supplies, rather than the inaccuracies
that are cited. With spot supply in limited demand, China are a lot better at
managing their orders than what the markets are giving credit for.
The steelhome china iron ore total ports inventory reports a circa 84Mts at
ports. This should perhaps be considered within the normal range, with slowing
demand. Remembering it’s a float for the steel economy and should run between 5
and 7 weeks of total demand. Admittedly yesterday's figures suggest it’s
dropped below 5 weeks demand. There's a simple explanation for the spike, one
that was pointed out awhile back, that being the hedgies have realised that a
lot of commodities have limited physical spot supply.
China has the additional woes for short supply, not only a reduced number of
smaller privately owned iron ore operators coming back online post their winter
break in the north. The supplies that would have naturally be replenished by
internal production are now being sourced on the market via spot supply (the
spike). Amazingly some state owned mines with costs at $70/t+ have been refused
permission to close and source on the international market. The Chinese
government may feel security of supply is required, in addition to contracts
with steel mills and avoiding a massive spike in unemployment.
The Chinese of course may do something about their northern mines (perhaps
'development' Grants) to avoid a growing discontent within the entire mining
sector. With proposals being considered for subsidies in hardest hit coal and
iron ore operators to at least maintain a 'sort of production.' (Direct quote
from a Chinese iron ore trader there!
Thankfully it’s made it very easy to make some decent gains in weeks rather
than months, with spot prices moving 8.5% in 6 trading days at circa
$62.5-63.10/t. There's a risk of limited upside so expect those able to supply
the demand to take some healthy profits!
With Xinchuang Li, (president of China Metallurgical Industry Planning and
Research Institute, & Deputy Secretary General, China Iron and Steel
Association), believes the range will be $55-65/t, implying that the peak seen
on Weds/Thurs of $63/t+0.9% is towards the top of the Chinese industry
consensus (read as wanting acceptable price). One would be wise to have a
confirmed change in direction before speculating.
The hope factors are reliant on the Chinese government increasing spending in
"infrastructure" projects to motivate the economy. This may be a
little optimistic with a shift from manufacturing, property (commercial and
residential) and infrastructure towards service-based industries. Remembering
of course the long-term averages (4-5 years) for iron ore stocks at ports is a
smidge under 90mts it’s not the panic some would have you think it is. One
could argue its almost like the Chinese are fracturing the market!
The positive is Atlas Iron is back in production, even coming out with resources
upgrades, a modest "non-cash
impairment charge on assets, a
royalty relief period and a deal on costs
including capital raising. It’s almost as though Atlas is an entirely
different company! With mining restarting and Mt Webber likely to help reduce
operating costs further. Post reorganisation, it could almost be worth a
punt!
With gossip about Fortescue Metals Group (FMG) in Australia, could they have a
very sizeable Chinese partner at operating level or a take-out; surely Baosteel
have been approved for 43B RMB overseas investment (imply 25% upside if there
was a take-out on FMG). With limited competition in the market for such assets
don't get too over-expectant about the price of a deal, or any deal for that
matter, so being without intelligence it was rude not to speculate on the
stock!
Oxus Plc (OXS) final
results in summary they cannot tell us (shareholders) anything, they
remain confident "of fair compensation" for their claim, and they've
put in a facility just in case it continues for a longer period of time. Quite
what the panel have been doing since May 2014 is anyone's guess. With clarity
on the actions of the Uzbekistan Government, it’s not difficult to assess the
quantum surely! Even as a range, perhaps one would be wise to consider there's
some 'behind' the scenes discussions or cattle trading is going on that 'may'
have delayed the outcome!
Having not "bothered" much with Minco (MIO) for some time (EMC: July 2014) the Q1 Results aren't really anything to get too excited
about. The currency gains should have been expected and the cash on hand and
value of investments is a plus for those calculator investors and giving
appreciation to the SP today.
What the market should consider is the possibly development of Woodstock being
considered by a Chinese entity, with some "potential" upside.
Supported in part by cash MIO has potential prospects at long last. After near
a year with little price movement, the 'tide just could have turned for
MIO" if they can complete on a deal. It would be an astute move by Hongxin
Group in terms of a currency hedged producer outside of the Hubei
province. With a deal last year in the Ukraine, it’s not beyond reason that
a Canadian project could have strategic importance.
Atb Fraser
Fraser- Thanks for the updates, as usual- there has been noise that a good part of the "stock" at ports in China has been v low grade and probably unusable now. I wonder if Li can get anything more specific in this respect- its not clear if this waste product has been included in past figures and now isn't included, but its a possibility and that may explain the drop in recent stock levels. Im sure the Chinese are getting smarter re their stocking levels and that this isn't the start of a new bull run for iron ore, one swallow may just be one swallow...
ReplyDeleteCheers. The Leggie
Leggie, Li and I were discussing this the other day. The port inventories, save for the commodity ghost inventory / financing, is largely of superior quality.
DeleteThe problem with inferior quality iron ore is mainly domestic supply, with this losing around 30Mt this year (my estimates and lower than the expected 80MT consensus) it's going to improve the supply chain.
Had the market tracked the steel production, the port inventories "HAD" to decline somewhat, with less demand it’s difficult to justify a run to 100MT+ in ports. Global steel production sagged in April, so it’s hard to justify significant inventories. If one looks at a longer-term trend, save for full out QE and remembering march steel production was down a modest 1.2-1.4%, Japan's steel production contracted near 6%, so overall, the port inventories I'd say are fair.
The quality controls and "steel mill" requirements have meant that QA has been higher on the imports than shall we say the questionable quality of some of the domestic supply. Obviously steel mills are now wise to grading more than a sample from the top of a delivery nowadays!"
Cheers Fraser
Thanks Fraser- that makes perfect sense, pre Friday alcohol which is a good thing. Everything makes sense after Fridays alcohol....
DeleteHave a great weekend. Cheers. The Leggie
Would like some more on iron ore. TIA
ReplyDeleteAnonymous, read above.
DeleteFraser- Two short videos from Aureus Mining (AUE) here- as they announce first pour from their New Liberty gold mine-
ReplyDeletehttp://brrmedia.co.uk/event/138824/the-aureus-mining-management-team
(With me on guitar, cutting off just before my vocal kicks in thank goodness) and
http://brrmedia.co.uk/event/138827/david-reading-ceo
A sunny Trent Bridge day for me so have a good un.
Cheers. The Leggie