Good morning, its been a manic week with the market being very demanding on all fronts.
With SVT's average pricing suggesting it's the lowest cost provider of water in the UK it's no wonder an offer is on its way for 2015. SVT's higher net debt weakened SVT's position of demanding a premium at various price tags up to 2530 (circa 2350 being the money) that have been suggested. In contrast the 14% profit margin will be appealing in light of the risks now being subscribed to the emerging markets.
More significance should be placed upon SVT's CAPEX and costs with supplier margins under pressure (P+ve for SVT) and that the area of supply is more favourable in capex than Thames Water (higher costs etc..). This is since Liz Garfield's arrival from BT (will need to double check), but a SVT's area of supply shows the population is growing with more resilience economically than other parts of the country (agricultural bias).
There's area for improvement in terms of SVT's bad debts for all water companies, whom appear to have the collection ability of the lottery commission. SVT's bad debt is running circa 2.2% of customers, compared to Thames Water whose problem caused an application to increase the bad debt levy in 2013. What more does a consortium of investors want? Over to Canada.
The BRIC forecasts are being amended in light of the massive changes in oil impacting all, with positive implications for China and India although Brazil and Russia being left out in the cold (add Venezuela on to that list as well).
Russia have kindly had another kick from America FT (further sanctions). One hopes that Russia doesn't knowingly find themselves in a corner. Russia is not one to tolerate being placed in the corner and if history is an indicator of the future will lead to an escalation. Had America waited the psychology of a dire economy, foreign exchange and capital flight would have pressured the Russian administration (read as Putin) to yield without too much egg on his face. As it stands the US sanctions have given a perfect headwind for propaganda. Over to Putin for the next shot, one has to wonder whether he's asked someone to turn the taps off, as American sanctions against Russia appear to be just a tad "over-egg-ski."
Dixons Carphone (DC.) have come out with the obvious interim results and benefaction from Phones 4 U (P4U) , with expansion aided obviously by the acquisition of P4U stores. Any of the long only contingent that did not have this in their portfolio should be asking why. A sure fire long, but there's a risk growing as a result of BT.A firing the first shot.
One hopes DC.'s model is able to survive not only the quad play offerings (BT.A) but those of the networks putting pressure on the market. DC. have a unique position where the networks (and change) may put significant pressure on the DC. With events unfolding with BT.A be prepared for some change in the Mobile Virtual Network Operators, something EE has a monopoly on.
All networks are intent or gaining customers directly dropping the middle man (improved margins), but with the main alternative being DC. they have plenty of dry powder in the event of strong-arming. If all networks decide to go direct only or limited offerings outside of their own subsidaries...EE were known to be considering this in July (2014), but under BT.A with their brand power, it would be wise to price in some risks to DC. .
Commodities unsurprisingly dropped again overnight with the speculation still categorically absent. The knife-catchers need more enticement, what say you $2.75/lb to bring out the post Christmas temptation across the board but using copper as the indicator. Gold had a lovely rally with the rouble yesterday only for the market to realise the cost of gold and uncertainties in Russia making any speculation short-lived.
Limited time for TATE (Tate & Lyle) but on reading could the tide be turning? Expect a change in tone from the sell side, but its not something to be rushing in to buy in the coming market. Perhaps one for later if I have time.
Atb Fraser
Fraser- Hi- some Xmas shopping for me re PFP- even I seem to be able to play the rollercoaster moves here and 1p does seem to be the point that brings out the sellers, at least so far. I hope Im not turning into a trader... I will have to get a second t shirt... :-)) "Amateur One Stock Trader" could fit the bill. Still it is paying for a nice turkey and some Xmas pud too :-))
ReplyDeleteRe DC- I have them on a watchlist but have not bought as I agree that they could get squeezed as the operators are pretty likely to go direct to the consumer and cut out DC and its like. I also don't like the Amazon threat, which is well in play already but with a business like DC with no economic moat and commoditised completely (just Google search anything electrical item you want and hey presto, a cheaper supplier comes up) and then Alibaba flys into play-- too scary for me, good luck to all longs in DC.
Cheers for now. The Leggie
'Benefaction' - have you received an early Christmas present of an OED?
ReplyDelete:-)
Incidentally I disagree with Leggie on DC. The issue is that at the high end ranges eg Samsung series 7 TVs and above very hard to get online. Also damage rates for large TVs on delivery with one man crews is very high (as high as 20-25%) so DC has differentiation in:
(1) Demonstration areas for high end TVs
(2) Manufacture support grants for marketing (and onsite sponsored staff)
(3) Two man delivery and logistics train
For manufacturers online only retailers are a nightmare as reduces the differentiation between high end products and low end of the same range - as high end features need to be demo-ed.
Incidentally was in local Costco today - very hard to find small tellies (one 39", one 40" - everything else (dozens of tellies) 42" to 80" - would not want to bet on the damage rates for 80" tellies. (PS I think DC prices are actually very competitive even vs Costco etc)
Roddy
Afternoon Roddy,
DeleteI try to keep simple for myself and apologise for using any intelligence:-) with a promise I'll return the dictionary tomorrow!
Its quite interesting Dixons for a number of reasons especially as most sales are based on see it / buy. Albeit AO. World are competing more and more in the space. Samsung's merchant/retailer support, and others is not what it used to be. With electrical purchases still justifying shop floor presence for the discerning purchaser (see John Lewis), it will take some time to erode the demand.
You mention feature demonstrations, AO clicked on to the video nature of demo's which ironically serve the purchaser better as they don't have to commit to memory the techniques/actions to function their purchase.
Its been awhile since I went to a CostCo, the last one was near Derby its not something I have planned for the future either.
You'll note the "do not short list" containing Catlin Group (CGL) and lo and behold, what's happened...possible offer: http://www.investegate.co.uk/catlin-group-limited--cgl-/rns/possible-offer/201412171320390433A/
A prime example when not to short a company progressively underpinning its earnings not in one year but future years with multi-year underwriting. Whomever was short/hedged in CGL were torched...
Atb Fraser
Very interesting - i just looked on AO.com for Samsung tellies of 40" and above. They have the following:
Delete58" --- H5200
48" --- H5000
46" --- F5300
43" --- H4500 - this is a plasma
40" --- H5000
In comparison Currys shows 36 Samsung TVs of 40" or above. (Note that some may be duplicates if eg they are part of a package).
The interesting point in this is that Samsung have 6 different (progressively better / high priced) TV ranges ie Series 4,5,6,7,8,9. It is interesting to note that AO.com is only stocking (or perhaps only being supplied) series 4 & 5 TVs.
Also, and I am sticking my neck out on this, I think the F range is an older (though still current) range vs the H range which is the current Samsung range (I think the F reflects 2013; H reflects 2014 but I stand to be corrected).
Of the tellies stocked in this selection at AO.com only the F5300 is smart if my analysis is correct.
On Amazon looking at 2014 Samsung tellies over 40" I compared the UE55HU7200 vs the equivalent at Currys. I selected this at random (was the first one that appeared on my list when looking at the Currys website) - was £2,898.04 on Amazon - versus £1,299.00
The points I think worth reiterating are:
(1) Suppliers have some degree of discretion on who they chose to supply - often by requiring certain products to have demonstration areas etc
(2) Supplier support of retailers is also targeted
(3) A £100 14" kitchen TV is a single spouse decision. A 50" £1000 - 2000 main lounge TV is going to be part of the 'decor' of the house and becomes a two spouse / family decision.
(4) At higher price points people prefer to look and see
(5) At higher price points, though I take on board your points eg demo videos (and interestingly Currys is doing them as well) nothing replaces actually looking and seeing
(6) For internet sales the 'last mile' ie delivering to the home is the most expensive part. Actually delivering to a superstore with (in some cases) the customer taking home can be cost competitive vs delivering via courier (especially when you have to have two man couriers).
(7) Added value services eg installation, taking the box away, wall mounting become added value services with bigger units.
(8) Higher end electronics become more like luxury goods. It does not cost much more to make an Armani handbag vs eg a no brand leather handbag. However to maintain the price point and exclusivity Armani will fight tooth and nail to stop Asda or Walmart stocking Armani handbags next to the frozen peas section.
(9) For both luxury goods and electronics the higher end products will be making disproportionate profit margins - almost because of rather than inspite of lower volumes. The higher end products also act to give a 'halo' effect to the rest of the range.
(10) Highlighting product differentiation at the high end is a matter of illustrating product value to the customer even if the additional cost to the manufacturer is minimal. For instance for a period of time, Samsung was the only manufacturer to have all of BBC Iplayer, ITV on demand, C4 on demand and C5 on demand on their TVs - Sony, Panasonic, LG etc lacked one or the other. I doubt the software costs were significant for Samsung but the differentiation and point of sales material illustrating this helped (I would suggest) drive sales in 2013 (ie last year) (especially after BBC iPlayer was switched off for some Sony blu-ray players in 2013/2014 - big issue in our household).
Sorry to witter on.
Roddy
Its evident my consumer goods knowledge is dire...I’ll have to revisit this. Commanding a market position has risks, more so with the dynamics of the mobile market changing. The Bread and butter of the consumer goods of Curry's is essential.
ReplyDeleteOne would still be wise to subscribe risks to the changing face of the mobile offerings no matter how bullish one would be. Especially in light of M&A with a little birdie today suggesting Sky are now talking re: O2 (Telefonica). Will perhaps share a few more thoughts in January on this.
Just shutting down for the day having been playing with DJI, the Fed giving a welcome bonus to all traders. Roaring away and out…FX following suit, the news and trend truly the Christmas traders friend.
Cheers F