Now I've been following the
Uranium Prices for some time purely for the "long trade", as the
short trade has been harder to evaluate as distressed traders attempting to
wait it out then dropping their stock/positions into market at near any
price.
What did start to make me think
that the market was turning was when Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank put the 'for sale' sign on
Iran's old uranium supplier. Most traders must be sitting on significant
losses based on the trading of Uranium specifically some banks that got into trading the cake.
Niger's main Areva mines appear to
be on Care and Maintenance. There's also some taxation jostling which has contributed to the lower production as Areva renegotiate historic taxation and
royalty contracts that look to benefit Niger for the first time since the
1970's far greater than the benefits Areva have had. The list of tax breaks and
concessions is endless (as per Reuters) and appear to be "made at any cost
to the country". More importantly Niger look to have tired of the iron
first of Frances demands and look to amend their existing mining and taxation
laws to enable them to increase their slice of the action.
The market will start to change direction on Uranium especially in-light of Japan's
restart to their Nuclear Generation, after all there weren't many other
options. Perhaps a greater "regulation" but it looks as though there
will be a steady flow of Uranium deals over the coming months both in merger
and acquisitions but also the 'positive' news flow that will prompt these deals.
Having been following Uranium all the way down, it doesn't make the person an
expert of change, but with a significant number of companies limited in growth or even
production at the current levels, its more than likely supply/demand & more
importantly speculation, will lead to a significant rise to a range of around
46-49$/kilo over the next 12 months. Yes a punchy 35-40% increase, but let’s
face it, Japan blighted the market as a result of the Fukushima disaster, so reopening
will contribute to the returns to a 'more balanced market place as demand
increases.' Albeit I'd be very surprised if it was immediately, there are a lot
of banks sitting on stocks that need to unwind these positions, so perhaps a
similar occurrence to the Platinum Market in the short-term.
Fraser
ReplyDeleteI don't follow uranium much but I have been watching it recently, as that 20 year megatons to megawatts agreement between Russia (formerly USSR) and USA ended in 12/13, so I thought this might help to establish some equilibrium in the mkt for uranium fuel as a whole. It did distort the mkt for years, but probably made the world a much safer place so I will forgive this indiscretion :-)
Havent the miners struggling to produce at a profit for a few years, in some ways mirroring the gold miners situation over the last year, and wont this Russian supply to the US need to be replaced by demand from the miners, which could see a price spike or am I looking at this from the wrong angle?
Re CHL- the RNS is obviously taking some time to type up- perhaps the matter has been complicated by a ROI low ball offer on losing the jurisdiction attempt? If this is the case, I would prefer two RNSs rather than one. Just my thoughts, nothing to back this theory up at all, apart from past experience.
Cheers. The Leggie