Good Morning,
China's banks have been reviewing the impact of declining
house prices and risk of a debt overhang (negative equity), occurring in 'most
cities ' (66/70) in China. Obviously, this will include syndicated loads to property developers and the probability of repayment or perhaps rolling over of loans/obligations.
With new builds down circa 22% and new land purchases by
registered developers, approaching a 40% decline year on year. The impact to
the 'average' earning Chinese worker is significant, and is being felt across
all of China. Whether Migrant workers, steel-makers, factory workers including those in equipment and machine
manufacturers, none are exempt from the downside is slower growth. This contagion has
already started to happen with a decline in factory output, and laying off of personnel. Today's flash PMI HSBC data confirms this (compiled my Markit).
Without further intervention, albeit, what else can the
Chinese Government do, as they have reduced interest rates, relaxed borrowing
requirements and eased property ownership rules. Save for further bailouts like
those of Evergrande Real Estate Group (HKG: 3333), the developers are up the
creek without a paddle. Same for Local Governments, whom were previously reliant on land sales and sales taxation revenue, all now significantly lower with the possibility of council tax/property taxation being considered to make up the short-falls in budgets.
The Chinese Government have put a band-aid on a shark bite
with the Chinese loan facilities extended to Evergrande (Circa$16B). With debts
approaching $31.8B (EMC figures inc. perpetual bonds $7B approx.*) and revenues in decline,
Evergrande's woes have only been delayed the inevitable, save for 'further
stimulus'.
Evergrande can make space for a Ghost Cities
segment in their reporting? Or delayed developments? At what
stage is the button pressed on a rights issue (to the Chinese Government or asset sales similar steel mills?) to
scrub the debt off Chinese Property developers books. This will of course continue
the perverse bull run on their stock prices, despite the sector running above
90+% net debt (average) across the industry and by a recent reports over the 120-130%
debt to equity (EMC) estimates.
Citron
Research, had a view, "that Evergrande was insolvent and had
consistently presented fraudulent information to the investing public." The
Securities and Fraud Commission in Hong Kong has an on-going misconduct
case against Citron. This started last Wednesday (18 March 2015), due to be finalised sometime
beginning of March 2016 (yes 4 years later) on or around 6 March 2015. It would
be wise to update ones diary on the tribunal. Although Citron's commentary
hasn't always been blinding, but it is certainly worth considering the views of
the short seller. Sometimes catching the mighty Deloitte on the back foot!
Today's mumble was delayed due to the requirements
of Game Digital (GMD), with Benedict Smith (CFO) stepping down after lengthy 26
months in the position after dire interim results.. With a decline in first half profits, (the company
already sign posted in January), it’s no surprise the stocks on the tank (again), and any
recovery in the SP from January was totally unjustified. The market is
competitive, with delivery available next day for those wanting to trim their
purchase price further.
The entire gaming industry is suffering the woes of a lack of
'new' blockbuster games enticing the loyal followers to part with their cash.
Margins squeezed on near the same revenue, although digital/online sales should
provide some support. At anything above 200 pence, one finds the price very
hard to justify. EMC remains negative on HOME and GMD as per the January commentary.. Although it’s wise to bank profits in the
latter on the news today. From a technical perspective, can GMD hold 240
pence...
Copper had a brief recover, going to $6000/t ($2.72+/lb.)
and now at $2.795/lb ($6160/t) despite the weak Chinese data, one assumes the
market has spotted the Chinese trades as well and the rush to cover short
positions on the dollar strength. The bets are on copper for Chinese stimulus
and national grid developments...for now.
Reviewing the AGM announcements for ESG (Eserveglobal) it
was a timely reminder for EMC's commentary on CFO Stephen Blundell flipping his options. The
EMC was subject to criticism from certain parties. With threats of reports to the FCA for market manipulation 'based' on the EMC view of Stephen
Blundell's director share sale and that of Investec's, being an indicator of what is to come.
ESG shareholders and the board consider it prudent to
appoint Stephen Blundell as the Chief Operating Officer. If the gossip is
correct, Stephen Blundell has put himself forward for the permanent CEO position, where he is
currently "interim" CEO as a result of Mr Paolo Montessori's resignation. The AGM statement, for those who have missed it. One would find
it hard to criticise a share sale where the stock performance has been
positive.
GATE ventures watch, circa 12% down, 'ramp-fabulous!' With some significant rumour flying round about Oxus (OXS), its wise to avoid further commentary until the result of the arbitration and the Jerooy Mine update. A reminder for those getting carried away, the Prime minister Joomart Otorbayev of Kyrgyzstan warned back in January that "Each prospective investor [for Jerooy] should be warned of additional legal costs."
Atb Fraser
Fraser- Yes- OXSs prospects re Jerooy aren't at all straightforward- Vistor (Russian miners) were the next to have a crack at the Jerooy asset after OXS and they have taken a $400m claim out against the Kyrgyzstani gov as their JV collapsed in acrimony in 2010, when they had the licence taken back due to lack of progress.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.eurasianet.org/node/66845
So OXS have to join the queue if and when Jerooy finds a third developer.... third time lucky anyone??
Cheers. The Leggie
Caught the clouding comments on ML. Your analysis at alpha camp last year about the bid data and cloud storage Cos. The belief was they should be a bolt on complimenting other IT services and for the multinationals with the money could not have summed the sector up. People did not like your view but looking across the sector its hard to disagree with hindsight. Any views now? We hope you can make it there in person this year? Maybe an igloo? Thanks Malc
ReplyDelete