Chaos this morning was greeted
with my retail shorts for which they have performed remarkably well.
Mothercare (MTC) unsurprisingly
being kicked yet again and strangley analysts and the like are now suggesting
it's bad times ahead. Well unsurprisingly its been bad for a long time, and
will be for the forseeable future unless things change, the liabilities and
performance (the rot) are becoming overwhelming. At their last update in
January the guidance was revised and no further drops have been evidenced.
Mothercare the brand, is being
devalued by a lack of investment in it. Forget the noise about the debt and the
trading, as this is secondary to brand (company) value. For sometime now I have
positioned myself as an amateur expert in footfall (getting Comet's collapse
correct, Halford's increases, Curry's wonders and the Supermarkets "lack
of expansion.") So without blowing smoke up my own proverbial, its with no
surprise that Mothercare scare stories are doing the rounds (so belatedly its
dire!). It was whilst having a drink that I realised Mothercare is what Jessops
was, the place to test out the kit before buying online. The consumer will pay
for this later, by their incessant belief and insistence that the price is the
be all and end all; but we'll ignore that for now as consumers will be over a
barrel in a few years.
Mothercare's woes mean that the
possibility of a premium take out are limited or perhaps the word is non
existant. The stores have value, which as it stands are perhaps the only asset.
There's got to be a cash call on the way or lights out, purely on the basis
that shareholders are unlikely to ever see a return on the current model. The
market should be looking for a change in its strategy to push the brand, how
they will do this is limited by the lack of ability to take risks from a top
down approach and innovate their customers. Their scale is not being utilised
in their pricing nor is it of benefit to the financial structure either. For
that reason, Mothercare needs to persuade a giant to take them on, refurb more
than just the stores and close the underperforming, sadly for the longs this
price cannot be justified at anything above 98 pence and that's excluding the
potential rights issue for £35M needed sooner or later at 85pence if they get
it away sooner rather than later. One shall await the 22nd May 2014 for MTC to
enlighten the market...
SuperGroup’s results are strangely identical to May 2012 in terms of disappointment, I’m sure the analysts will see more positives than I. In light of ASOS’s moves and lack of target achievements it comes as no surprise SuperGroup’s Market expectations were clearly higher than the results!
Zanaga Iron Ore Project Feasibility Study Results (ZOIC) (as Leggie pointed out) has
announced the Feasibility Results.
The ZOIC have you believe that Glencore (GLEN) are going to take out Zanaga at NAV? Surely one would have
included the NAV within the Feasibility Study in order to give the Shareholders
some cheer? So ignoring the fact its in the Congo (for which I now know better
having been shipping Pork Semi-Meaty Pork Ribblets to Matadi for some time
(long-story).
A blended return between Stage
one and two infers an Internal rate of return around 15%, or specific to stage
one of 12.7%. To be honest, I can’t see GLEN getting excited about that, then
again I could be proven wrong (but I doubt it!). So initially ZIOC was a $7.5
billion 30mtpa operation, that wasn’t that great either. However they’ve
finally worked out that cashflow could fund a proportion of this, so it’s with
NO SURPRISE whatsoever there’s a two stage development, and potentially three
stages if one was to be picky. They’ve reduced the development costs to a ‘modest”
$4.7 billion. The main benefit for ZOIC is the premium grade pellets its
suggesting is achievable, although its only suggested 2mt’s have been
identified as DSO, one will be left to wonder whether that’s per annum or one
off…
With GLEN busy with Mauritania
and looking for nearer term cashflows, one cannot help but wonder if a fresh
(greenfield) development is likely. One could argue that GLEN could sit there
for ever and a day and merely bide their time. A criticism for today is there’s
no assumed tax rate, nor does the Internal Rate of Return go far enough to
suggest whether its including tax, afterall they included Royalties so why not
specify the taxation? When someone realises, even an Amateur likes me needs the
basic yet significant detail of “taxation included in the announcement.”
GLEN’s deals in Mauritania with Société Nationale Industrielle et
Minière (SMIN) are years away…2022 by my estimated (albeit a positive for
pipeline). The poignant element is that life does not bode well for ZOIC when Ivan
Glasenberg highlights GLEN wants to focus on Brownfield sites, something ZOIC’s
Mine is not…shareholders in ZOIC may have to be patient for their deal with
GLEN…how patient? Who gives first Mauritania Government on Taxation or ZIOC on
NAV?
The final thought on ZOIC / GLEN
goes to the agreement, someone remind me of the terms having not read them for
awhile, but if I’m correct GLEN are only commited to funding ZOIC up to the
Feasibility Study? However GLEN do need to trade commodities as well, perhaps a
different angle to the Zanaga Project is to be able to trade the supply, after
all, as a major would you sell GLEN stock to impact on the price?
BT Group (BT.A) Final
Results come in nicely and money for old rope for us longs!
Morrisons (MRW) need a saviour, will that bottle of Gin be mine
Leggie! Surely the management and a few family members haven’t had more
meetings with a PE firm have they? It would be pure speculation to suggest MRW’s
“time to be taken out is now or never.”
Uranium: Woeful low, the long positions must now being torched as
houses/banks dump stock to monetise ‘something’. One holder had no choice but
to ditch or pay dearly, not that they haven’t already, why someone would assume
such large positions at $40 a lb without considering the slow journey down and
back up beggers belief. I suspect that trader is now relegated to sharpening
pencils albeit on a guaranteed bonus! If parties remember my belief about not
buying into Uranium producers with costs above $22/lb, you’ll now see why.
Sadly I haven’t got time for the Aluminium
impact, Randgold’s positives but a sell nor a Goodbye to Eastern Platinum
thankfully delisting which is delightfully entitled Miscellaneous
high priority announcements. I would like to thank the Board and the
holders for one of the most obvious short plays in the last year in the
Platinum Sector. Perhaps this delisting will bode well for their future? One
doubts it, but at least it’ll save a few quid a year.
Atb Fraser
Fraser- Re ZIOC- DSO is 2mtpa (for a couple of years I guess) as per their original plan but I wouldn't be surprised if they announce a major upgrade to the DSO available in a few months, perhaps doubling it, which would have been hidden in the FS in part by the stage 1 and 2 numbers announced yesterday, and at 60/62% it will bring in early bucks to aid the decision to finance, but perhaps still not quite enough. The GLEN commitment is also met in the main now, with the final commitment being to assist ZIOC in getting the finance - if its not aided by a GLEN loan in due course, I guess the other majors wont touch it so it will all go quiet- God help them if the Chinese offer- GLEN have just started their move into iron ore via the 7mtpa Sphere project so another higher scale project will probably be added but it may not be ZIOC. Lets see.
ReplyDeleteCheers. The Leggie
Fraser- Update from MET- they have had to announce that they haven't met their investment requirement so far so they will need to suspend the shares on 15/7/14 under the AIM 12 month rule.
ReplyDeleteThey have also clarified most importantly, that their litigation isn't over yet- they have settled with the auditors, the former directors but they still have the former advisors to pursue and whilst they haven't given an idea of the amount being pursued here, they have 3 separate sets of former advisors still in the firing line. This includes Metro Capital Mgmt, who were mentioned in the detailed 3/8/11 RNS outlining the main points for litigation and were a major target. The settlements to date could therefore hopefully be added to over the coming months, but the current directors would want to have time and some money to finalise the pursuits, so more value in here than I thought. I may have to try and get to the AGM, but it is looking even more positive for me at least :-))
Cheers. The Leggie