Thanks to D for sending this to Fraser. I have made a comment, because this man is asserting he's taken legal advice on Churchill Mining's case and has concluded that it's worthless. It not only shows he knows nothing about International Arbitration but worst, people whom clearly don't check the facts could have lost as a result. He infers the lawyer knows about International Arbitration Claims but if that was the case, would you have gone short? For those reading, and having done research, what percentage fail at International Arbitration? Especially as Churchill can clearly show their case?
Does it mean Churchill Mining are Guaranteed to win? Not at all, but there's a higher chance of success than failure. He may profit on his short at 20pence in Churchill of the term of the case because stocks in Legal Cases have a habit of drifting and spiking along the way, but likewise, people whom have invested of the past 2 years should have no capital risk on their investment now; you should have taken 4 fold profit at the very least via Spreadbets, CFD and stock.
I look forward to seeing 'Lucian Miers' inform and educate himself on International Arbitration...it's not for anyone to educate others but inform themselves of the risks, the same with Oxus Plc, Rurelec Plc any case for that matter.
Ian/Fraser (I've adapted Fraser's email to me haha)
Got to laugh @ someone not realising the values. I have to say, when I realised Fraser was involved, having paid my mortgage off on his Iofina work it got me reading chl/oxs/rur. Paid 12p closed 80% at 42 and will wait...thanks once again Ian & for bring one of the best share commentators to a small but so welcomed venue. I don't know You Ian but I'm sure you're on the ball like Fraser. Many thanks Jeff
ReplyDeletehttp://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/56766/churchill-mining-shares-rocket-after-updates-on-arbitration-latest-56766.html
ReplyDeletecheers for the page Dan