Interesting analysis of the results
by Richard Shead Executive Chairman. An update will come after a few
meetings, but it's thought provoking? Anyone have any startling concerns or
views?
Updated: May 19th 2013 Items in Italics
or blue are amended for ease of viewpoint or to bring attention to the issues
with greater significance.
Of course, there risks are that they
don't recover above what the current valuation is post-3rd Party Funding and
the amount of SEDA (Standby Equity Agreement) that's issued, albeit I as the
assets have been expropriated it's a case of how
much rather than losing. It's more realistic to expect near $150m than the
claimed total after but only time will tell.
SEDA's for those that follow, are known
to trash the shares, likewise, the company can open short positions on the
stock to improve their position in terms of the number of share per cash
raised. One bone of contention that, if you look at every company on AIM
excluding Xcite Energy to my knowledge has had their share price trashed as a
result of a SEDA.
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT
What’s only mentioned in the
contingent Assets is the Jero0y Project. In May, Eurogold settled their lawsuit
for A$7m in cash and shares, so that particular Damoclean sword no longer hangs
over directors. Additionally, in 2007 the old Jerooy property and a
couple of other exploration properties in Turkey and Romania were sold to
KazakhGold for $73m in shares, 90% of which it handed over to shareholders as a
dividend. A further amount up to $80m in cash will become due if
KazakhGold obtains a mining license for Jerooy. Arbitration with Kyrgyz Republic suspended pending
withdrawal of claim May 6th, 2008
Most of last year was spent by
directors and management in progressing the arbitration claim for the
misappropriation by the Uzbek Government of both the Company's Khandiza and
Amantaytau Goldfields mining assets in Uzbekistan, which resulted in a substantial
destruction of shareholder value of your company.
In order to ensure that your company
remains adequately funded to pursue its claims through international
arbitration, it successfully put in place both a litigation funding agreement,
which ensures that the legal costs of the claim will be funded through to its
conclusion, and an equity funding agreement to ensure that your company's
ongoing operational costs, which have as in the previous year been again
reduced wherever possible, will remain funded during this most difficult period
in the life of your company. Details of both these funding arrangements have
been fully disclosed in various RNSs issued during the past twelve
months. [I don’t see the purpose in the SEDA (Standby Equity Agreement)
surely those shareholders now invested would support a fund raiser which would
then enable the company not to drip feed to market and support the price]
It gives me great confidence that two
professional companies well versed in litigation funding and value creation
have, after reviewing Oxus' claims, taken the decision to provide the Company
with the financial support necessary to progress these claims to what I
confidently believe will be a successful conclusion for all stakeholders. [They owned an
asset and this was expropriated by the Uzbekistan Government so it’s value
rather than win or lose.]
With respect to the abuses suffered by
certain of our former employees, I wish I was able to provide more positive
news.
Mr Said Ashurov, AGF's former Chief
Metallurgist, remains in prison in Uzbekistan on what the company considers to
be an unjust and improper conviction for seeking to remove classified
information from the country, despite high-level approaches made to the Uzbek
authorities through diplomatic and other formal lines of communication. We
continue to remain hopeful that Uzbekistan will on humanitarian grounds release
Mr Said Ashurov, who I understand is critically ill, into the care of his
family. [Rather says why people shouldn’t invest in Uzbekistan]
A number of other former employees have
also had arrest warrants issued against them on what we consider are fabricated
charges. It is regrettable that the arrest and / or imprisonment of employees
is a standard tactic adopted by the Uzbek Government in its various disputes
with foreign investors in the expectation that the investor will capitulate and
not progress its claim for compensation.
In conclusion I would like to thank my
fellow director, management, staff and professional advisors for all their hard
work and support during the past twelve months, which will hopefully lead to
the enhancement of shareholder value in the foreseeable future.
Richard Shead
Executive Chairman
16 May 2013
FINANCIAL REVIEW
During the year ended 31 December 2012
management has continued to pursue the arbitration proceedings seeking
compensation for the Group in respect of the Amantaytau Goldfields
("AGF") and Khandiza mining assets in Uzbekistan. There are no other
operating activities currently being undertaken by the Group. The Company's
ability to continue with the arbitration process has been significantly
strengthened through the further reorganisation of the Group's liabilities
through entering into a litigation funding agreement and equity financing
agreement.
For the years ended 31 December 2012
and 2011 the Group has accounted for the investment in AGF as an
available-for-sale financial asset under IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition
and Management, recognising the loss of joint control of the investment.
Although the outcome of the arbitration proceedings is uncertain, compensation
sought from the proceedings exceeds the book value of the AGF and Khandiza
assets. Accordingly no provision is considered necessary against the carrying
value of the AGF investment. The carrying value of Khandiza, which was fully
provided against in 2008, was reinstated during the year ended 31 December
2011.
In January 2011 the Uzbek shareholders in
AGF agreed in principle to acquire the Group's 50% shareholding in AGF. In
February 2011 the Group submitted a detailed offer to the Uzbek shareholders of
AGF. No response has been received to the offer and instead AGF was subjected
to an extensive audit of its financial and economic activities by an audit
commission appointed by the Uzbek Government. This resulted in the Group
becoming unable to manage the operational affairs of AGF and a declaration of
force majeure in March 2011. On 31 August 2011 the Group commenced
international UNCITRAL arbitration proceedings against the Uzbek Government in
order to seek appropriate compensation. The Group has also included the loss of
the Khandiza base metals project in 2006 within the proceedings. The Arbitral
Tribunal has held that Oxus has standing under the Bilateral Investment Treaty
between the United Kingdom and Uzbekistan to bring its claims for expropriation
as a direct and indirect shareholder of the non-UK subsidiaries that have made
the investments in Uzbekistan.
On 17 September 2012 the Group
submitted its detailed Statement of Claim to the Arbitral Tribunal.
The Statement of Claim is accompanied
by an independent quantum report prepared by the international accounting firm,
Ernst & Young, and an expert opinion on valuation by international mineral
consultants, Wardell Armstrong International, quantifying the losses to Oxus as
a result of various breaches of the BIT by the Uzbek Government. The loss in
respect of the Khandiza investment is quantified as ranging from $72.1 million
to $588.7 million, and in respect of AGF from $480.3 million to $661.8 million.
The Ministry of Finance of the Republic
of Uzbekistan brought a claim of $10.8 million against the Company in respect
of the AGF Phase 2 Project Development Fund and obtained a judgment in its
favour in the Uzbek courts, which it sought to enforce in the English courts.
The parties have now agreed that all proceedings in respect of this court
action will be stayed until after the Arbitral Tribunal has rendered its final
award in the arbitration proceedings, or the arbitration is finally
discontinued or disposed of.
Since March 2011 the Group's access to
the accounting records, financial information and production data of AGF has
been severely restricted. In September 2012 insolvency proceedings were
commenced against AGF following a decision by the Navoi Regional Economic Court
of Uzbekistan. The Group, despite being AGF's largest creditor, was not
appropriately consulted during these insolvency proceedings and in February
2013 AGF was declared bankrupt by the Navoi Regional Economic Court. The
declaration of bankruptcy is not expected to negatively impact the arbitration
proceedings.
Fraser have you thought of a job as an analyst? having following you on markets live & read almost all the content perhaps its something you'd consider? I'll message my email.
ReplyDelete